Don't just trust the "patch applied" column.
Some people have problems creating patches, so sometimes the fix is described
with the issue.
Otherwise if only "patch=fix", some (most?) issues should be closed as
incomplete.
Something for the next release...
-Robert
> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:39:09 -0800
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [vote] Release Appassembler version 1.1.1
>
> I'm all for getting fixes in, but if there are no patches...
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I'm a bit disappointed you didn't pick up any other open issues. But if you
> > want to have a new fix-release, that's fine with me.
> >
> > +0
> >
> > -Robert
> >
> >> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:34:00 -0800
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [mojo-dev] [vote] Release Appassembler version 1.1.1
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'd like to release version 1.1.1 of the Appassembler.
> >>
> >> Appassembler generates bin and Java Service Wrapper scripts for Java
> >> applications.
> >>
> >> We solved 2 small issues:
> >>
> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11780&version=16887
> >>
> >>
> >> Staging Repositories:
> >> General: https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/
> >> Exclusive:
> >> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-029/
> >>
> >> Site:
> >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/appassembler/index.html
> >>
> >> SCM Tag:
> >> https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/appassembler-1.1.1
> >>
> >> [ ] +1
> >> [ ] +0
> >> [ ] -1
> >>
> >> The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >>
> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
