hmm. I will look into the mod inventory

On May 25, 2011, at 6:50 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote:

Basically, I want to keep the urls we have today for the latest released
version. For example:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/awesome-maven-plugin
A user accessing this url should see the latest site. He/she should not be
redirect to (for example):
http://mojo.codehaus.org/setup-maven-plugin/2.3
as that would then be the url he/she would bookmark. And that's going to
cause confusion when we release 2.4+.

/Anders

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:41, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > By "map" do you mean a redirect or is it possible to proxy in the
> > background?
> > I'm not sure I think a redirect is good. That would give the user a
> > versioned url that he/she might bookmark and then it will be outdated
> later
> > on.
>
> I'm a trifle rusty, but I thought that one of the redirect forms in
> .htaccess does what you want. But I'm not quite clear on what you
> want. Do you want to encourage or discouraged bookmarking the 'latest'
> url as opposed to a versioned url?
>
> If codehaus has the reverse proxy apache mod install we could also use
> it as you say, I used to know how to do that.
>
>
>
> >
> > /Anders
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:22, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> At my day job, we put the versions in the deployment URL.
> >>
> >> My proposal is then to use .htaccess to map '/foo' to the latest
> >> release '/foo/1.2.3'.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >>
> >>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>

Reply via email to