Right, we can wait yet another 4 month before doing a release just to have a
larger change log,
or we can follow the best-practice to release often, and plan a new release
ASAP.

This release has some untracked feature / enhancement, I agree we should
better log into Jira what happens in code :

The "compatibility" work on SDK was about checking for regression,
especially with integrated support for the javax.validation dependency, and
ready-to-go support for depedencies declared by gwt-user.pom. Running with
GWT 2.3.0 requires to override the plugin dependencies, that is only a
workaround.

There was no work on adding support for new options, as MGWT-277 - but
you're welcome to contribute ! just ask, I'll grant you access to github
account. If you do so, please add IT-tests for them so that we can latter
track regressions.

About our 2 blockers :

   - MGWT-246 <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGWT-246> is about the
   archetype that is only an helper feature (gwt sdk now has a -maven option,
   even it has not the same result), and I know many users that run it without
   error. Maybe it needs more documentation, but I've no time by myself to
   check (I don't use Eclipse). Contributions are welcome !
   - MGWT-278 <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGWT-278>  is about running
   Maven+Eclipse+GoogleEclipsePlugin together. As for MGWT-246 I know many user
   that make this work and others that complain about failures. I myself didn't
   have this to work few times and had to re-create my project from scratch. I
   can't see a fix for that, just expect better integration between M2E & GEP
   in future, especially Google including a M2E ProjectConfigurator... wait &
   see.

I'd be really, really pleased to see a fiable Eclipse+M2E+GEP configuration
and integrate it to the archetype. I just don't understand why GEP works so
bad when the project uses M2E and its dependency management :'( - or maybe
why M2E works so bad when the project uses GEP - or maybe why Eclipse is so
tricky :P




2011/6/7 Fotos Georgiadis <gfo...@gmail.com>

> I go for 0 on this one.
>
> Given that you can compile GWT 2.3 projects with the 2.2.0 version of the
> plugin just fine, I think version 2.3.0 should either be compatible with the
> latest GWT version (e.g. MGWT-277) or at least solve some issues (there are
> 2 blockers and 24 majors). How does this version provide GWT 2.3.0
> compatibility? A change log would be really nice, otherwise I can't find
> anything that justifies this release besides a couple of frustrated newbie
> users (that search for a documented version not yet released).
>
> On a side note: gwt-m-p 2.3.0 works fine in our project.
>
> -fotos
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>

Reply via email to