[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=282282#comment-282282
]
Ian Robertson commented on MOJO-1731:
-------------------------------------
So does the integration test in src/it/MOJO-1744 pass for you? I'm getting:
[INFO] Building: mojo-1744/pom.xml
[INFO] ..FAILED (2.2 s)
[INFO] The post-build script did not succeed. Expression:
log.readLines().get((index +=
2)).endsWith(org.slf4j:jcl-over-slf4j:jar:1.5.11:compile)
> BanDuplicateClasses fails when there is a dependency of type pom
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MOJO-1731
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1731
> Project: Mojo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: extra-enforcer-rules
> Reporter: Paul Vonnahme
> Assignee: Robert Scholte
> Fix For: extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-2
>
> Attachments: pom_dependency_fix.patch
>
>
> It tries to unzip all dependencies, and since a pom dependency isn't a zip
> file, it fails.
> {noformat}
> Caused by: java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file
> at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method)
> at java.util.zip.ZipFile.<init>(ZipFile.java:127)
> at java.util.jar.JarFile.<init>(JarFile.java:135)
> at java.util.jar.JarFile.<init>(JarFile.java:99)
> at
> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.BanDuplicateClasses.execute(BanDuplicateClasses.java:151)
> ... 22 more
> {noformat}
> This is a one line fix; I've attached a patch with a test case.
> The only thing I'm not sure of is if there would be a constant in the maven
> API somewhere I could have used such as !ArtifactType.POM.equals(o.getType())
> instead of using the actual string "pom" like I did:
> !"pom".equals(o.getType())
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
