I agree, it shouldn't look like a collection of homepages ;) The only thing I
can think of is replacing one of the banner images.@Christopher, do you have
concrete examples of you suggestion? -Robert > Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:31:32
+0100
> From: and...@hammar.net
> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Using the new maven-fluido-skin for mojos
>
> Regarding allowing each mojo to have their own skin, I'm not in favor
> of that. I think that all our mojos should have the same documentation
> look 'n' feel.
>
> /Anders
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 22:26, Christopher Hunt <hu...@internode.on.net>
> wrote:
> > +1 to upgrade the MOJO to use this as a default set of skins. They look
> > great.
> >
> > In addition I feel that it would be nice to let plugin authors skin their
> > pages in different ways; perhaps via a vote.
> >
> > On 29/11/2011, at 7:48 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> >
> >> An new skin, maven-fluido-skin [1], was recently released by the
> >> Apache Maven project. For the JAXB mojo, a patch submitter requested
> >> us to use that as he needs it for the documentation part.
> >>
> >> Should we use that for our mojos? Should we use a consistent skin for all
> >> mojos?
> >>
> >> Here's an example of using the new skin for a plugin:
> >> http://mybatis.org/maven-migration-plugin/
> >>
> >> /Anders
> >>
> >> [1] http://maven.apache.org/skins/maven-fluido-skin/
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >>
> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >
> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
