-1 All releases require votes. If you want to have a shorter time period for a release I am fine with that, but I think for anything less than 72h lazy consensus should not apply, i.e. I have run votes in the past where the criteria was "3 x +1 or 72h lazy consensus which ever comes first"
-Stephen On 16 May 2012 01:03, Christopher Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I propose that the Mojo project should not require votes for patch releases > (see (1) for a comprehensive definition of a patch release). Voting requires > a minimum of 72 hours to pass which may exceed a reasonable timeframe by > which to deliver bug fixes. There should also be no barriers to fixing bugs > in a release that is entirely backwardly compatible with its public API. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus. > > Kind regards, > Christopher Hunt > > (1) http://semver.org/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
