I think this mail should have gone to the Maven dev list, right? /Anders
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Baptiste MATHUS <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2013/8/6 Barrie Treloar <[email protected]> > >> On 6 August 2013 16:39, [email protected] >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Ok ... >> > >> > well I did read that naming info, I was just confused how to actually >> read it :-) >> > >> > "Apache Maven" "plugin" or "Apache" "Maven plugin" ... you see there >> are two semantics on how you could understand this. In my case it would >> actually be a "Maven plugin" from an Apache Project, but it's not a plugin >> from the "Apache Maven" Project ;-) >> > >> > But I the Definition regarding the Location of the sources is far less >> ambiguous. >> > >> >> Patches to improve documentation most welcome :) >> > > Patches to improve documentation most welcome :) > > Hi, > > I've attached a small improvement proposal on > https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGSITE-180 to try being clearer about > the naming pattern. > If someone can review and commit it if OK, that'd be great. > > Cheers > > -- Baptiste >
