On Dec 28, 2013 7:46 PM, "Karl Heinz Marbaise" <khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Hi to all > > 2. This plugin currently forks the life-cycle compile (generate): > > The question is: Why is this necessary (may be i misunderstand > a thing with those forking of the life-cycle)? > Wouldn't it be better having different goals (one which forks > an other which doesn't) to give the user the chance to decide > which to use?
Hello Karl Heinz, guessing: for the standalone execution phase compile gave the author the compile class path automatically? I dislike it when goals fork needlessly as this will lengthen build time considerably. IMO it would be great if you could at least add a '-no-fork' variant of the goal :).
