On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 17:11:22 +0100 Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > BTW: Why not doing a 1.0-beta-6 instead of 1.0-beta-5.1 ? You are right, I will redo the release. > > Based on the developer process > (http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/process.html): > > x.y.z-beta-n > Beta version, complete for the next release, not fully > tested/documented. > > > A quick fix version for 1.0-beta-5... > > > > We solved 2 issues: > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11362&version=19637 > > The link points to 1.0-beta-5 instead of 1.0-beta-5.1 > > The correct link is in my opinion: > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11362&version=19873 > > > [ ] +1 > > [ ] +0 > > +1 > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > -- Tony Chemit -------------------- tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28 http://www.codelutin.com email: che...@codelutin.com twitter: https://twitter.com/tchemit --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
