I think the community needs a unique and recognisable name. If CodeHaus is subject to copyright or any other rights outside of public domain, then we need a replacement. To please the French people on this list, I was about to suggest CodeMaison as a replacement for CodeHaus brand, but it looks like it is already taken :) Still, there are quite a lot of languages to explore for puns on CodeHaus name. -- Sergei
> >Thursday, 5 March 2015 08:38 +0000 from Baptiste Mathus <bmat...@batmat.net>: >2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY < herve.bout...@free.fr > : >>Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit : >>> *Project name* >>> May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner than later. >>> I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not be technical >>> but about the name of our project: what name should/could we use for the >>> project. >>> >>> Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after Codehaus EOL >>> (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo org)? or >>> "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult btw)? Or >>> change the project name even more? >> >>-1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to be precise) >>could be "Mojo for Maven" >> >>why not just "Mojo" as the project name? >>AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a need for "XXX >>Mojo", whatever XXX is? >Well, simply because of "googling". Try to find the mojo project by just >typing "mojo" :-). As it's a noun, and so on... >But, that indeed may not be a big issue since people may be more likely to >search foo-maven-plugin. >-- Baptiste
