+1 for review-then-commit. +1 on one "+1" from another committer and no "-1"s if the contributor is a committer. For the case where contributor is not a committer, is it still one "+1" from a committer?
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 for R-T-C. > > > before a commit (ie, at least three binding +1 votes and no vetos). > > IMO, one "+1" from another committer is enough. > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Leonidas Fegaras <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Dear MRQL-workers (miracle-workers), > > Thank you for volunteering to support the incubation of the MRQL > > project. I think it's time to start discussing some of the details. > > First, I would like to discuss the idea of adopting the > > Review-Then-Commit policy for MRQL, which requires consensus approval > > before a commit (ie, at least three binding +1 votes and no vetos). > > The initial committers would be those listed in the MRQL Incubation > > proposal. Let's discuss this during the next few days and then I will > > open it for vote. > > Thank you > > Leonidas Fegaras > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon >
