Hi,

I guess, you didn't change the conf files. Please overwrite the
hama-default.xml (every nodes).

Avro RPC has been removed because its serialization function consumes
high CPU, I/O, and creates a lot of object garbage.

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Leonidas Fegaras <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Edward,
> This shapshot fails in distributed mode:
>
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0: 13/04/24 16:53:41 ERROR
> sync.ZooKeeperSyncClientImpl:
> org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException$NoNodeException: KeeperErrorCode =
> NoNode for /bsp/job_201304241631_0002/peers
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0: 13/04/24 16:53:41 FATAL bsp.GroomServer:
> Error running child
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.hama.bsp.message.AvroMessageManagerImpl
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native
> Method)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClassByName(Configuration.java:820)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> org.apache.hama.bsp.message.MessageManagerFactory.getMessageManager(MessageManagerFactory.java:36)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> org.apache.hama.bsp.BSPPeerImpl.initilizeMessaging(BSPPeerImpl.java:294)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> org.apache.hama.bsp.BSPPeerImpl.<init>(BSPPeerImpl.java:185)
> attempt_201304241631_0002_000000_0:     at
> org.apache.hama.bsp.GroomServer$BSPPeerChild.main(GroomServer.java:1258)
>
> It seems that Hama is encoding messages in Avro now. I looked at the Hama
> jar files and there is no class  AvroMessageManagerImpl.
> Leonidas
>
>
>
> On 04/24/2013 03:25 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>>
>> Leonidas,
>>
>> Could you please test with
>> http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.7.0-SNAPSHOT/ and feedback
>> me?
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Leonidas Fegaras <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I think this is fine. I can test a pre-release of Hama 0.6.2 to make
>>> sure that works well with MRQL.
>>> I have also extended the MRQL make/ant files to work with Yarn. They will
>>> be
>>> part of the next patch. I have tested MRQL on Yarn in local mode only
>>> because I don't have access to a Yarn cluster.
>>> Leonidas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 22, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since Hama 0.6 version is more memory efficient than the old version,
>>>> let's try to release based on Hama 0.6.* version. I want to evaluate
>>>> MRQL's both MR version and BSP version, with large data sets on my
>>>> cluster. I'll fix that problem soon and release Hama 0.6.2. What do
>>>> you think?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Leonidas Fegaras
>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Edward,
>>>>>> Unfortunately, the current MRQL doesn't work correctly with Hama
>>>>>> 0.6.x.
>>>>>> It
>>>>>> works fine with Hama 0.5.0.
>>>>>> (The splits generated by the FileInputFormat in Hama 0.6.0 cannot be
>>>>>> smaller
>>>>>> than a block, while Hama 0.6.1 doesn't work correctly with comma
>>>>>> separated
>>>>>> paths, which prevents joins).
>>>>>> We can wait for the next Hama release (date?) or we can just release
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> is for Hama 0.5.0.
>>>>>> In either case, let's put a tentative release date:  May 15, so we
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> one month to write all guides and to setup a testbed.
>>>>>> Do you agree to have our first release on May 15?
>>>>>> Leonidas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 2:55 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I personally would recommend you release a first Apache MRQL (with a
>>>>>>> well-described guide on how to get started or involved) that works
>>>>>>> with open source Apache Hadoop 1.0 and Hama 0.6.x.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Leonidas Fegaras
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think the obvious person to manage the first release is me, if
>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>> other volunteer.
>>>>>>>> I don't have any experience with release plans. Do we need to setup
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> timeline for future releases?
>>>>>>>> Maybe we should develop a testbed first to be run on different
>>>>>>>> cluster
>>>>>>>> sizes
>>>>>>>> before each official release.
>>>>>>>> Leonidas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What are our plans for our first release under ASF? And who is
>>>>>>>>> going
>>>>>>>>> to do the release managing?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>>>>>>> @eddieyoon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>>>>> @eddieyoon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>>> @eddieyoon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>> @eddieyoon
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Reply via email to