Hello,
Could you please let us know your decision about the suitability of the
name "Apache MRQL"?
We have our first release ready for IPMC vote, but we are waiting to
resolve PODLINGNAMESEARCH-32 first.
Thank you and regards
Leonidas Fegaras
On 06/12/2013 10:28 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
+ [email protected] :)
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 12, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Leonidas Fegaras <[email protected]> wrote:
Could you please review the following search, which was used to establish whether
"Apache MRQL" is a suitable name.
It was posted by me on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-32
Thank you,
Leonidas Fegaras
The US and EU trademark searches, and the Google search, suggest that the
project name MRQL does not conflict with a previously registered trademark.
More specifically,
1) I checked USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) at
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/index.jsp
using the Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) for a registered trademark. The term I used was
MRQL, meaning that "MRQL" could appear by itself, or as a prefix or suffix to another
trademark (by searching "*MRQL*"). The search was performed for live and dead terms, for
all fields: owner name and address, serial number, and combined word mark. No matches were found.
2) I searched the EU Office for Harmonization of the Internal Market (OHIM), at
the Community Trademark Online database (CTM-ONLINE)
http://oami.europa.eu/ows/rw/pages/QPLUS/databases/searchCTM.en.do
and found 0 trade marks.
3) I did a web search on Google for "MRQL". From the first 100 hits, all those
links that do not refer to this MRQL project (pre-Apache or the incubating one), do not
refer to any other project or product.
.
