Leonidas Fegaras created MRQL-19:
------------------------------------
Summary: Fix license issues to prepare a new release candidate
Key: MRQL-19
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRQL-19
Project: MRQL
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 0.9.0
Reporter: Leonidas Fegaras
Assignee: Leonidas Fegaras
Fix For: 0.9.0
We need to address the license issues reported by sebb before we stage a new
release candidate for vote.
Here are sebb's emails:
http://markmail.org/message/z66lnr5q4u24rwal
http://markmail.org/message/k7zvajrn3hnla3ve
My opinion is that we should not release any binary artifacts. We release only
source. The problem is that the generated jars must bundle all the dependencies
(which are the runtime JLine and CUP libraries) in order to run as single jars
on Hadoop or Hama. This means that we have to repeat the JLine/CUP classes in
the MRQL jars, which is something sebb doesn't like. Also, if we release
binaries, the license files of the source distribution must be different from
that of the binary since we don't use JLine/CUP source code.
What do you think?
All the other issues are easy to fix.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
