Hi Leonidas, Do you think there's a path forward for MRQL? E.g. is there enough to revive a community?
John On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:54 PM Leonidas Fegaras <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > Yes, I think we should discuss retirement. MRQL has been dormant during > the last few months. MRQL is incubating for more than 4 years. We had 4 > releases but very little community growth (one PMC member in 2014 and > one committer in 2016). I am disappointed but, frankly, I don't see how > to Increase the number of active committers and expand our user community. > Leonidas Fegaras > > > On 07/05/2017 02:48 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > > > I'd like to understand the current status of MRQL and figure out if its > a project that should retire or not. It seems that activity has died off > this year, very little activity at all. The last was the logo change in > April and before that a small code fix in January. > > > > Is the project planning to move forward? > > > > John > > . > > > >
