Hi Justin, Thanks for sharing that. I reviewed the content and found them very helpful in clarifying the requirement. I recommend community members to review them for a better understanding of the branding requirements.
On the incubator PR policy, one part that isn't clear to me is the following statement: > However, the Apache Press Team MUST review any releases by affiliated > organizations or groups to ensure they comply with these branding guidelines. It's unclear to me what the affiliated organizations or groups refer to. How does an organization or a group qualify as being affiliated and how do PPMCs typically enforce this? Best, Sheng On 2020/10/22 22:47:04, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > In recent time I've noticed a lot of issue with use of the Apache MXNet > brand. In short the project name is "Apache MXNet" not "MXNet" and needs to > be called that by 3rd parties. If you as a committer or PPMC member find the > company you work for, or someone else, is not calling it "Apache MXnet" you > need to do something about it. > > For more information please see the ASF policies on naming and branding see > [1] and this set of slides and talk by Shane [2][3] will also help. He also > gave a similar talk at this years ApacheCon which should be up on the ASFs > YouTube channel shortly. There is also incubator policy [4] which requires > press release to be reviewed before being published. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ > 2. > https://www.slideshare.net/shanecurcuru/profiting-from-apache-brands-without-losing-your-soul > 3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cQMhysKeyU > 4 https://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html >
