> I suppose it's more business friendly, but it's not a requirement for > releasing binaries under Apache, correct? That is, this is a policy specific > to the MXNet project?
It is a requirement to release the binaries under AL2. You can refer to https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for a list of compatible and incompatible licenses. LGPL is Category-X (not allowed) as it places restrictions on the larger work. > Oh and look at that, the artifacts are using a generic "-gpu" string as part > of their names. I would like to consult with the authors of those artifacts > to see what they think of adding versions here before committing to tracking > specific versions of CUDA. It's not something I would personally relish to > do, until someone actually cares about it at least that is. It's fine with me to re-use the existing pattern if others don't mind. > Now, where can I get an account for that server... Anyway, someone will just > need to put their credentials as secrets for GitHub Actions and then we just > need to change the URL here for the snapshots: We can open a ticket with [Apache Infra](https://infra.apache.org/). Would you like to open a PR first? > it would be good to know what the official stance is concerning the use of > external services. I suppose anything from GitHub is OK, but other than that, > I wonder. It's fine to use external services as long as the project maintainers (PPMC) control the usage and the published artifacts are compliant with the ASF polices (for example, don't contain LGPL compontents). -- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17783#issuecomment-754661195
