> Nice work! I think we can still keep an alias of the module in the original > namespace just so that whoever is using it won't be broken. > > Also, name-wise, mx.onnx seems more succinct to me, though it's not a strong > preference.
Thanks, I think both are good suggestions! -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/20063#issuecomment-803691090
