+1

Verified both the nightly Jenkins CI pipelines - NightlyTests and
NightlyTestsForBinaries - are passing for RC3.

Thanks.
Manu


On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:38 PM Zhu Zhaoqi <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1. Built RC3 and tested cpu bert inference, mx2onnx wheel generation, and
> onnx bert onnx export.
>
> Thanks
> Zhaoqi
>
> Skalicky, Sam <[email protected]> 于2021年6月7日周一 下午9:13写道:
>
> > +1 tested extensions examples on CPU
> >
> > Sam
> >
> > On 6/7/21, 8:51 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of
> Przemysław
> > Trędak" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> > not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > know the content is safe.
> >
> >
> >
> >     Also +1 (binding) vote from me. Retested with the newest changes.
> >
> >     Thank you,
> >     Przemek
> >
> >     On 2021/06/07 02:19:39 Dick Carter wrote:
> >     > Given that the CI issue with rc2 is fixed, reiterating my +1
> > (binding) vote.  -Dick
> >     >
> >     > On 2021/06/04 04:54:06, Serge Panev <[email protected]> wrote:
> >     > > Dear MXNet community,
> >     > >
> >     > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > 1.9.0. Voting will start Thursday, June 3rd, 2021 10:00 PM and close on
> > Monday, June 7th, 2021 10:00 PM PDT.
> >     > >
> >     > > Link to release notes:
> >     > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.9.0+Release+Notes
> >     > >
> >     > > Link to release candidate:
> >     > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.9.0.rc3
> >     > >
> >     > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> >     > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.9.0.rc3/
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> >     > > +1 = approve
> >     > > +0 = no opinion
> >     > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > Best regards,
> >     > > Serge Panev
> >     > >
> >     >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to