The archiving is a paid feature, or having a public Slack channel that
users of the software can join without having to come cap in hand to the
dev@ list?

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Right, now that Amazon is gonna buy Slack for 9B - maybe we can do that -
> otherwise that kind'a stuff would only work for paid Slack subscriptions.
>
> :-)
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Sebastian Schelter <
> ssc.o...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ideally, the slack channel should also be archived somewhere, so that
> > people can search through past conversations and search engines can index
> > them.
> >
> > Best,
> > Sebastian
> >
> > 2017-06-15 9:58 GMT+02:00 Isabel Drost-Fromm <isa...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 06:49:21AM +0200, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> > > > anyone with apache.org shuld be able to register on slack -
> Sebastian
> > > was
> > > > asking me the same question in Berlin last week.
> > > >
> > > > Suggest leave the channel open to anyone registering with apache.org
> > > email.
> > >
> > > Is there a way to make it entirely public? @apache.org mail addresses
> > > only go to
> > > ppl who are already committers. The goal of any such channel should be
> to
> > > attract new blood to the project...
> > >
> > > Isabel
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sorry for any typos: Mail was typed in vim, written in mutt, via ssh
> > (most
> > > likely involving some kind of mobile connection only.)
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to