The archiving is a paid feature, or having a public Slack channel that users of the software can join without having to come cap in hand to the dev@ list?
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, now that Amazon is gonna buy Slack for 9B - maybe we can do that - > otherwise that kind'a stuff would only work for paid Slack subscriptions. > > :-) > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Sebastian Schelter < > ssc.o...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Ideally, the slack channel should also be archived somewhere, so that > > people can search through past conversations and search engines can index > > them. > > > > Best, > > Sebastian > > > > 2017-06-15 9:58 GMT+02:00 Isabel Drost-Fromm <isa...@apache.org>: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 06:49:21AM +0200, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > > > anyone with apache.org shuld be able to register on slack - > Sebastian > > > was > > > > asking me the same question in Berlin last week. > > > > > > > > Suggest leave the channel open to anyone registering with apache.org > > > email. > > > > > > Is there a way to make it entirely public? @apache.org mail addresses > > > only go to > > > ppl who are already committers. The goal of any such channel should be > to > > > attract new blood to the project... > > > > > > Isabel > > > > > > -- > > > Sorry for any typos: Mail was typed in vim, written in mutt, via ssh > > (most > > > likely involving some kind of mobile connection only.) > > > > > >