There appears to be licensing problems also with tvm. Can it just be removed as a submodule? will the nnvm there build without it?
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> wrote: > I mean Mxnet is not using tvm as a direct dependency. The support is being > done in nnvm compiler, which is not part of the release > > Tianqi > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:39 PM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > As far as i know Mxnet is not using tvm for now. So you can simply not > > ship that jar > > > > Tianqi > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> tvm has a jar in it that (along with other things) is blocking 1,0 > >> release. > >> Can someone on tvm team please address this? > >> > >> Also, is mxnet 1.0 using tvm now? I don't recall this being discussed > at > >> all on dev@. If not, why is it in there? There's no licensing > references > >> as well, which is problematic. Is it necessary for 1.0? > >> > > >
