Apparently Apache supports OATH, so I am open to either. Good idea for the docker thing.
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Marco de Abreu < marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote: > GitHub SSO allows the neat feature that login and permission can be > selected depending on the access rights a user has to a project. Somebody > with write access (committers) would be get different permissions than > somebody with only read access. > > We could check back with Apache for SSO, but this would involve Apache > infra. We could put it up to a vote whether to use GitHub or Apache SSO. > > In order to reproduce a build failure we have been thinking about changing > the ci_build.sh in such a way that it can be run manually without Jenkins. > The setup I took over binds the Jenkins work directory into the docker > containers and uses a few hacks which are hard to reproduce locally. We > plan to reengineer this script to make it easier to run manually. > But making the AMI public is a good idea! We plan to make the whole > infrastructure code (based on Terraform) completely public - at the moment > it's in a private repository as it contains credentials, but they will be > moved to KMS soon. It would definitely be a good approach to just supply > the AMI so everybody could recreate the environment in their own account. > > -Marco > > Am 05.01.2018 7:51 nachm. schrieb "Chris Olivier" <cjolivie...@gmail.com>: > > Well, login to the Jenkins server, I would imagine. > > github or Apache SSO (does Apache support OAUTH?) seems like a good idea as > long as there's a way to not let everyone with a github account log in. > > Access to actual slave machines could be more restricted, I imagine. > > Eventually, a public current AMI for a build slave would be good in order > to reproduce build or test problems that can't be reproduced locally. > > wdyt? > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Marco de Abreu < > marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Would it be an acceptable solution if we add SSO or do you also want > access > > to the actual AWS account and all machines? > > > > Yes, the build jobs are automatically getting created for new branches. > > > > -Marco > > > > Am 05.01.2018 7:35 nachm. schrieb "Marco de Abreu" < > > marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com>: > > > > I totally agree, this is not the way it should work in an Apache Project. > > It's running on an isengard account, meaning it is only accessible for > > Amazon employees. The problem is that a compromised account could cause > > damage up to 170,000$ per day. There are alarms in place to notice those > > cases, but we still have to be very careful. These high limits have been > > chosen due to auto scaling being added within the next week's. > > > > I'd be happy to introduce a committer into the CI process and all the > > necessary steps as well as granting them permission. The only restriction > > being that it has to be and Amazon employee and access to console, master > > and slave only being possible from the Corp network. > > > > There is no open ticket. What would you like to request? > > > > -Marco > > > > > > Am 05.01.2018 7:22 nachm. schrieb "Chris Olivier" <cjolivie...@gmail.com > >: > > > > Like John and other mentors were saying, it's not proper for CI to be a > > closed/inaccessible environment. Is it running on an Isengard account or > > in PROD or CORP or just generic EC2? I think that we should remedy this. > > It's very strange that no committers have access at all. Is there a > ticket > > open to IPSEC? > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Marco de Abreu < > > marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello Chris, > > > > > > At the moment this is not possible due Amazon AppSec (Application > > security) > > > restrictions which does not permit user data and credentials on these > > > machines. > > > > > > I have been thinking about adding single sign on bound to GitHub, but > we > > > would have to check back with AppSec. > > > > > > Is the reason for your request still the ability to start and stop > > running > > > builds? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Marco > > > > > > Am 05.01.2018 7:11 nachm. schrieb "Chris Olivier" < > cjolivie...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > Marco, > > > > > > Are all committers able to get login access to the Jenkins Server? If > > not, > > > why? > > > > > > -Chris > > > > > >
