Chris, Thanks for starting this vote.
This is long pending

+1 to change org.apache namespace

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Marco de Abreu <
marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> I gave my +1 for the code modification. The -1 was for Nan Zhus proposal to
> get it into 1.2.
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > If you're tying this to a process issue, then it's no longer a code
> > modification technical vote.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Marco de Abreu <
> > marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Right
> > >
> > > Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 12. März 2018,
> > > 17:38:
> > >
> > > > Are you saying your vote is contingent upon the outcome of a separate
> > > vote?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Marco de Abreu <
> > > > marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for changing the namespace
> > > > > -1 for merging this change into master according to the current
> > policy
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 12. März
> 2018,
> > > > > 17:34:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Release versioning is a separate issue or vote.  At release time,
> > > > people
> > > > > > can "demand" version X or Y.  This vote represents "do we want to
> > > > change
> > > > > > the namespace".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Nan Zhu <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think we'd specify it will change in the next version (1.2)?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Chris Olivier <
> > > > cjolivie...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This vote is for the code-change of altering the Scala API
> > > > namespace
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > dmlc to org.apache.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Vote will conclude on Thursday, 5pm PDT.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Chris
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to