+1 to combining feature and feature request Haibin Lin <haibin.lin....@gmail.com> schrieb am Do., 12. Juli 2018, 10:15:
> +1 merging "feature" with "feature request" > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Anirudh Acharya <anirudhk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > There is another instance of label duplication - We have labels > "Feature" ( > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/labels/Feature ) and "Feature > > Request" ( > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/labels/Feature%20request ). I > > don't think there is much difference between these two labels. > > > > It would make sense to merge the "Feature" label into "Feature Request". > > > > > > Thanks > > Anirudh > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:50 PM Hagay Lupesko <lupe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thank you everyone for your suggestions. > > > I will work with a committer to get this updated ASAP. > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:55 AM Marco de Abreu > > > <marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 to renaming to Backend > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:13 AM Hagay Lupesko <lupe...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Lin for your feedback. > > > > > Bumping again to get more feedback before concluding. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:53 AM Lin Yuan <apefor...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Hagay. Using "Backend" as label makes it much easier > > to > > > > > track. > > > > > > "C++" label only describes the language used in implementation, > > > > > "Backend" > > > > > > better describes the nature of the work (let's assume we change > the > > > > > backend > > > > > > implementation from C++ to other languages in the future). > > > > > > > > > > > > Lin > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 1:09 AM Hagay Lupesko <lupe...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks everyone for chiming in and clarifying. > > > > > > > It seems that the "C++" label name is confusing for our > community > > > > since > > > > > > it > > > > > > > can be interpreted as both the CPP API and the backend... > > > > > > > As an anecdote, this issue [1 > > > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10937>] is > > > labeled > > > > > as > > > > > > > "C++" but is about the CPP API, not the backend. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should we just rename "C++" to "Backend" to avoid confusion? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10937 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:39 PM Pedro Larroy < > > > > > > > pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agree with Anirudh, they are different things. Maybe change > the > > > > "C++" > > > > > > > label > > > > > > > > to "backend" would be more informative? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:11 PM Anirudh < > > anirudh2...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Hagay, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should keep these two labels seperate since they > > > mean > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > things. > > > > > > > > > The C++ label refers to the issue for MXNet backend and the > > CPP > > > > > > package > > > > > > > > > refers to the CPP language binding for mxnet. > > > > > > > > > We can still make C++ API great again irrespective by > > filtering > > > > out > > > > > > CPP > > > > > > > > > package issues :). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anirudh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Hagay Lupesko < > > > > lupe...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey community, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was going over the open GitHub issues for MXNet, and > > > noticed > > > > > that > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > two labels for the CPP API: "CPP package", "C++" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wanted to suggest we remove "CPP package" and just stick > to > > > > "C++" > > > > > > > > > > This will make it easier for the community to classify > > issues > > > > and > > > > > > > focus > > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > making the C++ API great again ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if someone has any concerns, otherwise I will > > > find > > > > a > > > > > > > > > committer > > > > > > > > > > that I can work with to make this change. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Hagay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
