Kellen and Tao - yes, the understanding is that dependencies need to be considered and all licences referenced to include in top level LICENSE file. Appreciate your help with it. Steffen
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:39 PM kellen sunderland < kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry to hear about the licensing issues. I was following the general vote > but I'm still lacking some clarity around what licenses in the onnx-trt > repo need to be surfaced. I believe onnx-trt is MIT licensed, but it > includes Onnx as a third party repo which then brings in dependencies with > a variety of licenses. The proposal is that we look at these on an > individual basis and then add them to our top level LICENSE file right? > > An alternative is that we may be able to checkout a smaller source code > dependency tree if we remove a few unneeded ONNX's dependencies (pybind and > google-bench). My hope is that this wouldn't affect our compilation > process and would get us down to two licenses to report (just Onnx and > Onnx-TRT, both MIT). > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:07 PM Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > For some more context, these were the last emails I sent on the dev and > > legal lists requesting help on the open questions – > > > > 1. Question on legal about the CC-By-2.5 > > < > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201805.mbox/%3CCAK1xzDe6ECToKt_2cTR_7txQQCwHeYfvxXDfmuGgfA3jaTs=j...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > 2. Question on dev about googletest file > > < > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201804.mbox/%3CCAMGgKDC8szdfFqQhhSNpwwT_3zi4LBS7A=u4v7kj4ule44u...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > 3. General Request for review of the licenses wiki > > < > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201801.mbox/%3CCAMGgKDCi=s933zcVWwei15i5uBC1h88VUogt3Br=Vq28=vi...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > > (Note: You can click on the the “>>” next to the thread on the top right > > to view the next responses in the email threads in the apache archive. ) > > > > Thanks, > > Meghna Baijal > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:30 PM Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear MXNet community - > > > as you should have seen in previous email, voting for v1.4.0.rc0 has > been > > > cancelled. We received a -1 vote due to outstanding license issues. > > > Please help to update > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Licenses > > > and > > > resolve outstanding issues. > > > > > > I would like to ask specifically for help from contributors to mkldnn, > > > opemmp and onnx-tensorrt to address the feedback from Justin - see > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ebb8c4c00fb66dd98da13621c7dcb8753fee57562a861d61379d31e9@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > . > > > > > > I suggest to fix the issues first on master, then cherry-pick and merge > > to > > > 1.4.x branch. > > > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude Julia from 1.4.0 release as integration into > > > MXNet repo and upgrade to 0.7+ is WIP. > > > I'm suggesting to exclude googletest/googlemock from 1.4.0 release as > > > outstanind license issues are not resolved yet. This should not impact > > > users. > > > > > > Please provide your feedback to the suggestions. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Steffen > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM Steffen Rochel < > steffenroc...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community - > > > > I hope you have seen that voting for v1.4.0.rc0 has started and will > > > > continue until December 27th noon. So far two binding +1 votes. > > > > I suggesting the following schedule to account for holidays and of > > course > > > > depending on voting feedback. > > > > > > > > Vote on dev@ until 12/27 > > > > > > > > Vote on general@ 12/28 – 1/3 > > > > > > > > Release announcement with pre-build language bindings 1/9 > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have concerns with the proposed schedule. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Steffen > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM Haibin Lin < > haibin.lin....@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Steffen, > > > >> > > > >> Aston and I would like to bring this PR to your attention: > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13686, where Zhi > fixed > > > the > > > >> num_worker argument of DataLoader on windows. Without this fix, > using > > > >> DataLoader with num_worker > 0 would result in crash on Windows. > > > Bringing > > > >> this PR to 1.4.x would greatly benefit windows users of MXNet. Aston > > is > > > >> working on the dive into deep learning book > > > >> <http://diveintodeeplearning.org> based on MXNet, which is due and > > > frozen > > > >> for publication next week. Currently the book will depend on MXNet > > 1.4.0 > > > >> and discourages readers from using multi-worker DataLoaders due to > > this > > > >> bug > > > >> on Windows. With this fix Aston can update the examples in the book > > with > > > >> DataLoader using multiple workers, which will be very beneficial to > > the > > > >> broader MXNet community. > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> Haibin > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:11 AM Pedro Larroy < > > > >> pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi Steffen > > > >> > > > > >> > Added some notes in your PR for the release notes. > > > >> > > > > >> > In particular, I'm a bit concerned about the status of topology > > aware > > > >> > communication, since it has open issues and is not being tested in > > CI. > > > >> > (The tests also fail). I think we should anounce it when it's > > working > > > >> > properly and it's well tested. > > > >> > > > > >> > Pedro. > > > >> > > > > >> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:06 AM Steffen Rochel < > > > >> steffenroc...@gmail.com> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Dear MXNet community - > > > >> > > all issues beside one > > > >> > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/13438> have > > been > > > >> > > addressed. I suggest to document the last remaining issue as > known > > > >> > problem > > > >> > > and move forward with the release. > > > >> > > Please communicate if you have concerns of know about critical > > > issues > > > >> to > > > >> > be > > > >> > > addressed before starting vote about releasing 1.4.0 as soon as > > > >> possible. > > > >> > > Please also have a look at the release notes > > > >> > > < > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes > > > >> > > > > > >> > > and provide feedback. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > I'm planing to start voting beginning of next week. > > > >> > > Steffen > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:31 PM Steffen Rochel < > > > >> steffenroc...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Hi Pedro - this are indeed the draft release notes for v1.4.0. > > > >> Please > > > >> > add > > > >> > > > description as you suggested. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > All - please have a look at the release notes and provide > > feedback > > > >> and > > > >> > > > suggestions.. > > > >> > > > Steffen > > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:30 AM Zhao, Patric < > > > patric.z...@intel.com> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> Hi Steffen, > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> I saw the draft of 1.4 release notes in here ( > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes > > > >> > > >> ). > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> Is this near the final version? I'd like to add some > > > descriptions > > > >> of > > > >> > new > > > >> > > >> quantization features enabled in 1.4. > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> Is it OK? > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> --Patric > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > > >> > > >> > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com] > > > >> > > >> > Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2018 1:12 AM > > > >> > > >> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > > > >> > > >> > Subject: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > Dear MXNet community - > > > >> > > >> > I would like to provide update on v1.4.0 status, details > are > > > >> tracked > > > >> > > >> here > > > >> > > >> > < > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i > > > >> > > >> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status> > > > >> > > >> > . > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > Thank you very much for everybody effort to resolve the > > > >> identified > > > >> > > >> issues. > > > >> > > >> > We are down to 3 open issues - for details please see > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28in > > > >> > > >> > cubating%29+1. > > > >> > > >> > 4.0 > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > +Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.4.0ReleasePlanandSt > > > >> > > >> > atu > > > >> > > >> > +Release+Plan+and+s-OpenPRstotrack > > > >> > > >> > < > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1. > > > >> > > >> > 4.0ReleasePlanandStatus-OpenPRstotrack> > > > >> > > >> > Please help to resolve the remaining issues and integrate > to > > > >> v1.4.x > > > >> > > >> branch. > > > >> > > >> > Current estimate to address the identified security > > > >> vulnerabilities > > > >> > in > > > >> > > >> the > > > >> > > >> > Scala/Java package and merge into v1.4.x branch is end of > > next > > > >> week > > > >> > > >> > (December 14th) I will communicate as soon I have more > > > >> information. > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > Regards, > > > >> > > >> > Steffen > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
