Thanks, Qing. Plan is in the email. I thought about suggesting a wiki guideline, but on second thought I think once a good structure is in place, things would self-organize in that structure, and I don't want to intimidating people by forcing them to read :)
After experimenting, by using the move tool in cwiki it doesn't seem to affect edit history or authorship, so I see no reason to bother others. Given the positive feedback in the last couple of days, I will go ahead move things around and report back the diff once finished (and I won't remove or modify content). -sz On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:09 AM Qing Lan <lanking...@live.com> wrote: > Agreed +1. > Could we draft a plan on CWIKI and let's sign up our name to migrate the > pages to the right location? > > Thanks, > Qing > > On 1/21/19, 6:18 AM, "Anton Chernov" <mecher...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A quick tip about links to the wiki pages, note the difference in > links: > > * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Process > (1) > * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/BINjB (2) > > If sharing was done via the 'Share' menu the link (2) would persist > after > any structual movements. > > Best > Anton > > > сб, 19 янв. 2019 г. в 16:49, Pedro Larroy < > pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 2:51 PM Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > +1, Good idea. > > > > > > It's not very easy to find out the related contents since lots of > > folders in the website. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Sheng Zha [mailto:zhash...@apache.org] > > > > Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2019 3:28 AM > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > > > > Subject: Taxonomy on our cwiki > > > > > > > > Hi MXNet, > > > > > > > > Given that currently cwiki is the only place other than mxnet > website > > for > > > > mxnet-related documentation, I'd like to request your attention > to the > > > > (slightly disorganized) cwiki page of MXNet. The top level > folders > > (and their > > > > contents) currently looks like this: > > > > - Design Proposals* (bag of proposals, not in order) > > > > - Development* (mixture of guides, roadmaps, processes) > > > > - Release Process (release notes) > > > > - Website (guides and proposals) > > > > - MXNet Clojure (call for contribution, guides) > > > > - MXNet Keras Integration (design) > > > > - MXNet-ONNX Integration (design, dev status) > > > > - MXNet R Package (guide, backlog) > > > > - MXNet-Scala (design, dev status, guide) > > > > - Content Formatting Templates (not a folder but link to two > docs) > > > > - How-to articles (1 guide) > > > > - Community (guide on apache-related processes) > > > > - Data IO (designs) > > > > - Continuous Integration (guides, designs) > > > > - Meetups and Hangouts (events) > > > > > > > > And here are two good examples from successful Apache projects: > > > > - Apache Flink: an **audience-oriented** structure [1] > > > > Users (Presentations and How-to) > > > > Contributors (Dev processes and How-to) > > > > Committers (Infra, Dev processes, Release processes, Releases) > > > > Roadmaps and Feature Designs (archive) > > > > - Apache OpenNLP: a **content-oriented** structure [2] > > > > Guides > > > > External Resources > > > > Proposals > > > > Releasing > > > > > > > > Clean organization helps content discovery and saves time on > locating > > useful > > > > content. Given that we have good amount of content on the wiki > page, I > > > > suggest that we decide on a cleaner taxonomy, re-organize > contents > > > > accordingly, and add future contents accordingly. To provide a > > starting point > > > > for the discussion, I suggest: > > > > - Given the state we are in, start with content-oriented > organization, > > use > > > > these top-level categories: Guides (including processes and > how-tos), > > > > Development (including designs, proposals, notes, roadmaps), > Community > > > > (including events, activities, external resources and contents) > > > > - If people strongly prefer audience-oriented structure, later > we can > > adopt a > > > > structure similar to Flink's. > > > > > > > > Feel free to share your thoughts and preferences here. Thanks. > > > > > > > > -sz > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Apache+Flink+Homehttp > > > > s://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Apache+Flink+Home > > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENNLP/Index > > > > >
