+1 
build mxnet from source with large tensor support. Ran tests only for large 
array. All passed !

On 9/19/19, 2:58 PM, "Lai Wei" <roywei...@gmail.com> wrote:

    +1
    
    build from source on GPU and tested with gluon estimator and latest
    keras-mxnet.
    
    
    Best Regards
    
    Lai
    
    
    On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:02 PM sandeep krishnamurthy <
    sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
    
    > Thank you Tao for leading this and all the community members for helping 
in
    > this release.
    >
    >
    > +1
    >
    >
    > -[Y] Are release files in correct location?
    >
    > -[Y] Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
    >
    > -[Y] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
    >
    > -[Y] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
    >
    > -[Y] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
    >
    > -[Y] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
    >
    > -[Y] Is the NOTICE year correct?
    >
    > -[Y] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
    > NOTICE?
    >
    > -[Y] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
    >
    > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
    >
    > -[N] Does the software have a compatible license?
    >
    > -[Y] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
    >
    > -[Y] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
    >
    > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
    >
    > -[Y] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
    >
    > file?
    >
    > -[Y] Do all source files have ASF headers?
    >
    > -[Y] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
    > control?
    >
    > -[N] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
    >
    > -[Y] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
    >
    >
    > Except the license issue mentioned in this Github issue -
    > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15542
    >
    >
    > I was able to build from source on GPU(p3.2x EC2 instance) and run
    > opperf-operator
    > benchmark utilit
    > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/master/benchmark/opperf>y
    > successfully
    > with no regression compared to v1.5.0.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:51 AM Anirudh Subramanian <
    > anirudh2...@gmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    > > +1
    > >
    > > Build from source with cmake and ran unittest for gluon and amp.
    > >
    > > Noticed that test_sync_batchnorm fails on p3.8xlarge (hidden by the CI
    > > because passes on machines with 1 or 2 gpus).
    > > I have opened an issue for the same
    > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16214 though I think
    > its
    > > not a blocker for this release.
    > >
    > > Anirudh
    > >
    > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:28 AM Chaitanya Bapat <chai.ba...@gmail.com>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > > > +1
    > > >
    > > > Correctly built for GPU, CPU on Ubuntu 14.01 (10.1 Cuda for GPU)
    > > > Ran image classification (resnet50+cifar10)
    > > > Ran Operator Performance (opperf)
    > > >
    > > > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 02:12, Tao Lv <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > Hi community,
    > > > >
    > > > > Friendly reminder: it is less than 1.5 days remaining, so please 
take
    > > > your
    > > > > time to verify and vote.
    > > > >
    > > > > Thanks,
    > > > > -tao
    > > > >
    > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:06 PM Lin Yuan <apefor...@gmail.com>
    > wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > > +1
    > > > > > Tested Horovod on GPU
    > > > > >
    > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:16 AM Zhao, Patric <
    > patric.z...@intel.com>
    > > > > > wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > > > +1
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Tested MKLDNN backend and everything looks great.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
    > > > > > > > From: Qing Lan <lanking...@live.com>
    > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 2:20 AM
    > > > > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
    > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) 
1.5.1.rc0
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > +1 for Scala/Java test. Passed all tests for CPU/GPU build.
    > > > > > > > Also tested build from source with static build.
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Thanks,
    > > > > > > > Qing
    > > > > > > > ________________________________
    > > > > > > > From: Tao Lv <ta...@apache.org>
    > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 14:14
    > > > > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org <
    > > dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
    > > > >
    > > > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.1.rc0
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community,
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > This is the 3-day vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating)
    > > version
    > > > > > > 1.5.1.
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Voting on dev@ will start September 17, 12:00pm (PST)  and
    > close
    > > > on
    > > > > > > > September 20, 12:00pm (PST).
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > 1) Link to release notes:
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > >
    > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Notes
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > 2) Link to release candidate:
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.5.1.rc0
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > 3) Link to source and signatures on Apache dist server:
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.5.1.rc0/
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > +1 = approve
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > +0 = no opinion
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > Thanks,
    > > > > > > >
    > > > > > > > -tao
    > > > > > >
    > > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > --
    > > > *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
    > > > *+1 (973) 953-6299*
    > > >
    > > > [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
    > > > <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
    > > https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat
    > > > ]
    > > > <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
    > > > https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya
    > > >[image:
    > > > https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
    > > > <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
    > > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Sandeep Krishnamurthy
    >
    

Reply via email to