Tianqi, I think that statement can go in both directions. The Chinese government is actively restricting companies from operating if they do not cooperate with the government and weaken their security. Thus, I would not consider HashiCorp to be actively discriminating here.
>From that point on it's political and since the policy does not apply to us, I think it's better to close the discussion here. -Marco Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> schrieb am So., 31. Mai 2020, 19:38: > https://opensource.org/docs/osd > > 5. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups > > It would be useful to focus on ^ principles, and focus on building better > software together. > > TQ > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 9:33 AM Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Marco, > > > > At the time I started the thread, the specific term related to China > reads > > as follows: > > > > PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SOFWARE MAY NOT BE USED, DEPLOYED, OR INSTALLED IN > > THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. [1] > > > > My concern with the above clause is that it starts the practice of > > HashiCorp targeting a group of the community resides in a specific > region. > > I'm worried that they could change terms of use at any moment that could > > render the normal usage illegal and our community members liable. > > > > The situation has changed as HashiCorp indeed revised the specific clause > > to include only Vault enterprise version. From the reply I think you only > > read the updated version. Since the current version of their term of use > > doesn't affect our project anymore, I'm OK to leave it as is. > > > > -sz > > > > [1] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZLJJwjUYAM8Xk-?format=jpg&name=large > > > > On 2020/05/31 09:58:08, Marco de Abreu <marco.g.ab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The statement is specifically about HashiCorp Vault enterprise edition > - > > > speak a single module of their enterprise suite which is about > credential > > > encryption. > > > > > > I didn't read further, but my first guess is that they are not offering > > it > > > in China since the Chinese government - as far as I can recall - is > > > restricting the usage of encryption methods to those, which they > consider > > > weak and exploitable. > > > > > > From that point on, it becomes more a political question. I personally > am > > > quite concerned about a government using their power to undermine > > security > > > of software. > > > > > > Since this statement is only about vault enterprise edition and we're > not > > > using vault at all, I'd leave it as is. Supporting such a horrible > > practice > > > by "boycotting" HashiCorp in general would send the wrong signals from > > an > > > open source communities point of view. > > > > > > -Marco > > > > > > Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> schrieb am So., 31. Mai 2020, 05:08: > > > > > > > Dear community, > > > > > > > > Yesterday, HashiCorp added to their terms of evaluation the clause > that > > > > forbids usage of the enterprise version of any HashiCorp software in > > the > > > > People's Republic of China [1]. While this does not affect the usage > > of the > > > > community version, it does signal the potential legal risk to many of > > our > > > > community members in China. In light of this recent development, I'm > > > > initiating discussion on deprecating the usage of HashiCorp software > > and > > > > services and forbidding their usage in MXNet infrastructure until > > situation > > > > changes. > > > > > > > > I believe that the community cannot be traded for the technological > > > > convenience. Currently, we have part of our CI and GitHub labeling > > robot > > > > bootstrapping logic that relies on Terraform, a service provided by > > > > HashiCorp [2]. Since all its usage that I found are for bootstrapping > > on > > > > AWS, replacing them with CloudFormation is feasible and likely > > > > straightforward. > > > > > > > > Your input is appreciated. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Sheng > > > > > > > > [1] https://www.hashicorp.com/terms-of-evaluation > > > > [2] > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet-ci/search?q=terraform&unscoped_q=terraform > > > > > > > > > > > > > >