org.apache.myfaces.mailinglist.EmailStackOverflowError

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:32:18 +0100, Martin Marinschek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for a meta decision ;)
> 
> 
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:25:17 +0100, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > What about this decision itself, do we need a meta decision process? ;-)
> > Oh, I love recursive self-references :-)
> >
> > Manfred
> >
> > Heath Borders schrieb:
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:44:07 +0100, Martin Marinschek
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >>+1
> > >>
> > >>regards,
> > >>
> > >>Martin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:21:22 -0700, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Hi All,
> > >>>
> > >>>I'd like to propose that we use the same process that Tomcat uses;
> > >>>
> > >>>http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html
> > >>>
> > >>>As you can read in the copied thread below this is one of the last
> > >>>remaining items before we become a top level project (cool!) so we need
> > >>>to nail this down RSN.
> > >>>
> > >>>I believe all we have to do is point to this page (correct Ted?)
> > >>>
> > >>>Thoughts?
> > >>>
> > >>>TTFN,
> > >>>
> > >>>-bd-
> > >>>
> > >>>On Jan 7, 2005, at 3:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>>We mentioned applying for TLP in the proposal. So, if that's
> > >>>>>what we still want, then yes.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Unless, of course, there is another TLP that you would like
> > >>>>>to join instead.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Personally, I think the scope is broad enough to justify its
> > >>>>>own project.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Yes, think so too. So with a TLP myfaces.apache.org, there is
> > >>>>enough room for subprojects like you guys to with Struts.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>One candiate will be perhaps the WML RenderKit
> > >>>>and the extra components. (the TilesViewHandler one I'd like
> > >>>>to see inside of tiles.apache.org -Yes I saw your draft on
> > >>>>that)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>> Ok, we have to *convert* the documentation etc into forrest xml
> > >>>>>> stuff, that should be added to http://incubator.apache.org/myfaces/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Of course, you know that Forrest is not a *requirement*. You
> > >>>>>can use anything you like.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>I'm not sure about PHP though. We'd have to check with
> > >>>>>infrastructure. There's an inclination to have the sites end
> > >>>>>up as HTML, to minimize server load.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Since I got a basic knowledge of forrest and since it is
> > >>>>usable from ANT, I think forrest will be fine. Also the
> > >>>>current homepage is based upon forrest, so why not continue.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>At weekend I will try to convert some docs from myfaces.org
> > >>>>to our page.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>I didn't mean that I added, only that, if it were me, I'd
> > >>>>>make it a status "page" rather than a status "file".
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>You might just add a "Status" page to the Community tab. A
> > >>>>>"Roadmap" page might do as well. What the checklist says is:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>" (Committers, non-incubation action items, project resources, etc)"
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>There are Incubator PMC members who do insist that projects
> > >>>>>have a "status file", so we need to make sure this is handled somehow.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Ok, I try...
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>> that looks very *generic* but why the mention of Struts inside of
> > >>>>>> ibatis?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Oops, typo.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I need to lookup some historical dates for the Incubator status
> > >>>>>>> page, but we seem otherwise good to go.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>I slacked on the dates and just updated the page in
> > >>>>>Subversion to say "DONE", but haven't published it yet.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>As far as TODOs go, what's left are the "decision making guidelines".
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>-Ted.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> >
> 


-- 
-Heath Borders-Wing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to