BTW. seams only build JSF-API, shipped by MyFaces: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/gump/project/myfaces.xml?view=markup
How to add the rest? Must we contact the infrastruce guys on that issue? -Matthias > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 7:32 PM > To: 'MyFaces Development' > Subject: RE: A few more suggestions > > > > I'm not sure what you mean by "instead of". Gump is a > different beast > > entirely, and isn't related to whether you use CVS or SVN. > > It's more of a > > continuous integration tool, although its goal is to ensure > > that changes > > in one project don't inadvertently break other projects, > > rather than to > > work on a project by project basis. > > sure like cruise control! > Not Gump *instead of* CVS/Subversion ;-) > instead of migrating process, since we > here have guys that relay on CVS... > > sorry for missunderstanding email... > > > > Does anybody know much about GUMP? > > > > I'm not an expert by any means. But I know enough to see that > > MyFaces is > > already building successfully in Gump. For example, see the log at: > > > > http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/buildLog.html > > Ah! I expected, that should be setup by a project, > but still done. > > Do you also know where the nightly builds are stored? > or aren't they stored? > > > > Btw. Martin, are you using GUMP inside > > > of Struts? > > > > Gump isn't typically used by projects themselves. Rather, > > there is a Gump > > installation that builds just about everything at the ASF (and many > > projects from elsewhere as well) several times a day. If > your project > > breaks, you will receive "nag" messages telling you that. > > thanks for pointing this out! > that was new for me, that it also builds MyFaces. > -Matthias > > > -- > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Matthias > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 6:35 PM > > >> To: MyFaces Development > > >> Subject: Re: A few more suggestions > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Bill Dudney wrote: > > >> > > >>> Ted, > > >>> > > >>> Would it be possible for us to stay in CVS for the next > > few months > > >>> then do the conversion? I've not had to do it myself but > > I've read > > >> that the cvs2svn > > >>> script is supposed to do a good job of moving all the > > >> history over. Once the > > >>> IDE plugins catch up we could make the jump. > > >>> > > >>> Thoughts? > > >> > > >> I'm not Ted ;-) but I would say that shouldn't be a problem - > > >> depending, of course, on how many months a "few" turns out > > to be. ;-) > > >> But we can cross that bridge when we come to it. > > >> > > >> The cvs2svn tool does a great job of preserving > > everything, history > > >> and all. Once you're ready to make the move, the usual > practice is > > >> to load everything into a test repo, let people play > around with it > > >> for a couple > > >> of days, and then give infrasructure the nod. It should be > > quick and > > >> painless for all involved. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Martin Cooper > > >> > > >> > > >>> -bd- > > >>> > > >>> On Jan 17, 2005, at 4:26 PM, Ted Husted wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Moving to Subversion was "strongly suggested" when we > > drafted the > > >>>> incubator proposal. However, the developers felt that > the CVS IDE > > >> tools were more > > >>>> mature, and that they would prefer to wait before switching. > > >>>> > > >>>> To receive the CVS logs, subscribe to > > >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > >>>> > > >>>> -Ted. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:21:00 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Sean Schofield wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I have a few more suggestions for the MyFaces > > development team: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> #1) Consider moving from CVS to Subversion (SVN) when > > >> its time to > > >>>>>> leave the incubator. Apache has both types of repositories > > >>>>>> available. Struts just recently moved to SVN and > > people like it. > > >>>>>> I'm not totally familiar with advantages vs. > > >> disadvantages but it > > >>>>>> seems to be a lot more flexible. If this is something we'd > > >>>>>> consider than it would be best to do it at the same time as > > >>>>>> MyFaces leaves the incubator. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I would strongly encourage this. Apart from the fact > > that all of > > >>>>> the ASF repositories will eventually be required to > > move from CVS > > >>>>> to SVN, SVN really does have some excellent > advantages. The two > > >>>>> biggest, in my experience, are atomic commits > (meaning that all > > >>>>> changes within one commit are handled as a single > > >> transaction) and > > >>>>> ease of refactoring. From an infrastructure > perspective, using > > >>>>> moving to SVN means that individual Unix accounts for every > > >>>>> committer are no longer required. > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> #2) Regardless of whether we use SVN or CVS, it would > > be nice to > > >>>>>> email the developer's list when users check in. This is a > > >>>>>> standard practice with other Apache projects and helps > > >> developers > > >>>>>> keep track of changes to the codebase. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Yep. Not sure why this isn't happening already. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Martin Cooper > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> sean > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
