I was thinking that it would be great if it was JSF based, but until that happens, we should just stick w/ Forrest.
+1 for forrest. On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:51:02 +0100, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and the logo looks very good to me! > > regards, > > Martin > > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:50:32 +0100, Martin Marinschek > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 from me for Forrest - as we have already started with this > > technology, I think we should go ahead with that. > > > > although it would be great to have JSF as a framework for the site ;) > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:40:26 -0500, Sean Schofield > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Earlier I suggested we might want to adopt a look and feel similar to > > > the Ant site. I've attached an image of a mockup of what this might > > > look like. It still says "ant" in a bunch of places but I didn't feel > > > like changing everything - you get the idea. > > > > > > Thanks to Chris Barlow also who provided me the Apache-MyFaces graphic > > > (I definitely think we should use this on the site.) I'm attaching > > > the logo graphic separately. > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > -- -Heath Borders-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
