The blank and Tiles applications still have their own source directoriesl. Matthias and I thought we could move the examples src to its new location because its basically being shared by both the examples and the new simple webapp.
One solution to your concerns could be to move it back to the examples app and just copy it to the simple app during the build. The build script will have to be adjusted slightly. sean On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:15:33 +0100, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I strongly agree with this, especially as e.g. the myfaces blank > application should only come with its respective sources. > > regards, > > Martin > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:02 +0100, Manfred Geiler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > What was the reason to move the src dirs of the web applications into > > one webapps/src dir?! > > This breaks structure and is very confusing, IMHO. Each webapp should > > have it's own sources, that should be clearly separated. If - for > > non-redundancy reason - we need classes in two or more webapps we > > should make a webapps common src dir. > > Proposal: > > - Leave webapp sources at /webapps/src but in different sub folders: > > /webapps/src/examples > > /webapps/src/tiles > > /webapps/src/wap > > and so on > > - Package structure should stay the same: > > /webapps/src/examples/org/apache/myfaces/examples > > /webapps/src/tiles/org/apache/myfaces/tiles > > /webapps/src/wap/org/apache/myfaces/wap > > and so on > > - One common webapp sources dir > > /webapps/src/common/org/apache/myfaces/common > > > > -MG > > >
