I don't think that should be necessary. It seems weird that that would be a limitation.
On Mar 31, 2005 10:15 PM, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of our users was trying to using their own extended version of > tree2. In their faces-config.xml (their version, not the default one > in the jar) they had the following ... > > <component> > <component-type>org.apache.myfaces.HtmlTree2</component-type> > <component-class>org.objectsource.ui.UITree</component-class> > </component> > > So basically he was just replacing the component class for tree2. > When he tried to use tree2 in a page he got just a blank page. > > Once he added the following everything worked fine ... > > <renderer> > <component-family>org.apache.myfaces.HtmlTree2</component-family> > <renderer-type>org.apache.myfaces.HtmlTree2</renderer-type> > > <renderer-class>org.apache.myfaces.custom.tree2.HtmlTreeRenderer</renderer-class> > </renderer> > > This is the *same* renderer block as in the default faces-config.xml > that is inside the jar. The user is reporting that MyFaces is > requiring the renderer to specified in the user's faces-config.xml > file if the component is overridden there. > > Is that true? If so, is that a MyFaces bug/limitation or is that in > the specification somewhere? > > sean > -- -Heath Borders-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
