A couple of general notes: * Three level hierarchies are not really a good idea, because the leaf nodes of the tree have a hard time getting either the attention they want or the oversight (from the PMC) that they need. I would not do that.
* At the end of the day, anyone you accept as a MyFaces committer has commit rights on the entire source tree of the project (if that weren't the case, then the separated code should be in its own project). Therefore, the organization of the source tree is better thought of as being centered around artifacts that you want to be able to deliver independently of each other, not around building subcommunities. Layout is just a convenience to make building and releasing packages easier. Craig On Apr 11, 2005 6:04 AM, Heath Borders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I really like the shared classes as a subproject, and I'd actually like to > see more things moved in that direction, like the auto-building of > ValueBinding-getters through an XML file. I agree that this could put more > pressure on our impl. and components classes because there is another API > that we must keep stable. However, when your JSF project starts getting > really big, you start needing all the utility/helper classes like we have in > the shared section. If someone is using another implementation, it might be > a way for us to get our foot in the door. > > > > On Apr 11, 2005 6:42 AM, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for your attention, Alex. > > Only a typo. Actually I meant "Collection" instead of "Components", so > > the correct sentence should be: > > "I would rather make this a subproject of Collection (see structure > below)." > > > > Sorry, for the confusion, > > -M > > > > On Apr 11, 2005 1:34 PM, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But would this not imply, that stuff underneath the "sandbox" must > > > be a component? > > > > > > What about stuff that should evolve into the implementation (eg. new > > > non-jsp renderkits) or into the commons (eg. new utility-classes) > subprojects? > > > > > > regards > > > Alexander > > > > > > -----Original Message----- (shortened) > > > From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 1:09 PM > > > To: MyFaces Development; Sean Schofield > > > Subject: Re: Proposal: Modest Restructuring of MyFaces Project > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Sandbox > > > ======= > > > I would rather make this a subproject of Components (see structure > below). > > > > > > Project Structure > > > ============= > > > So, my proposed structure is: > > > > > > Apache MyFaces > > > |-- Apache MyFaces JSF Implementation (myfaces-impl) > > > |-- Apache MyFaces JSF Commons (myfaces-jsfcommons) > > > |-- Apache MyFaces JSF Collection (myfaces-coll) > > > |-- Apache MyFaces Components (aka "Tomahawk") > > > |-- Apache MyFaces "Sandbox" > > > |-- other subprojects to follow... > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > -- > -Heath Borders-Wing > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
