+1 for removing the $Log$ stuff. There is no support for the Log (or a
similar) keyword in subversion so I suppose it's better to remove the
log entries from the source files as they won't get any updates. As Sean
said: all the information is in the svn logs anyway, no need from my POV
to maintain the same information in the source files.
Oliver
Sean Schofield wrote:
+1 for removing them. Subversion (and CVS) keeps the same history and
they just clutter up the source code and documentation.
On 5/9/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SVN experts, is there really no alternative or backward compatibility solution?
:-(
-Manfred
2005/5/8, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yes, I found that nice too :-(
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 21:27 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
oh yes...
what a pity, I liked that small tidbit of information!
regards,
Martin
On 5/8/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Subversion doesn't support the $Log$ :
http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#log-in-source
As those $Log$ sections will be outdated, I think we should start removing
them.
Any thoughts ?
--
Oliver Rossmueller
Software Engineer and IT-Consultant
Hamburg, Germany
http://www.rossmueller.com
