inline--> 2005/5/28, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > As James mentioned, he and I had a long phone conference last night > where he brought me up to speed on some subversion tricks and how > various things are done. He is very keen on mavenizing MyFaces but > IMO we should do that as a second step once we get the SVN structure > set up.
Yes, I also feel better with a step by step approach. > But maybe we can move the release and website stuff to Maven. Oh no, we just started to get forrest under control... :-( > Here is a revised summary of the bundles and their contents. > > myfaces-1.1.2.m2.tar.gz > ============================= > --> myfaces-impl.jar > --> myfaces-api.jar > --> myfaces-all.jar > + api > + impl > + components > + tiles > + xdoclet > + wap > + validators > + sandbox > -->javadoc > + api > + impl > + tomahawk > + sandbox > > myfaces-tomahawk-1.1.2.tar.gz > ======================= > --> myfaces-tomahawk.jar > + components > + tiles > + xdoclet > + wap > + validators > --> javadoc > + tomahawk > > NOTE: no sandbox stuff > > > I think we more or less have agreement on this list but perhaps I > missed some people's feedback. The main changes are: > > 1.) No more tomahawk-lite.jar (you either use tomahawk.jar and the RI > or you use myfaces-all.jar) +1 on that > 2.) myfaces-all.jar includes *everything* including the sandbox -0.5 on bundling sandbox with myfaces-all I like the idea of a separated sandbox jar more. A separate jar gives the sandbox more sense IMO and also makes no difference between Myfaces-Impl or RI users. -Manfred PS: Sean, thanks very much for your initiative!
