If I had to choose between lonewolf and tomahawk I would chose 'lonewolf' as it is less martial and potential peace-lover users will like more...
I agree with John in the official name, that should include *catchy-short-name* Faces Extensions. I think that names with more than two syllabes are more difficult to remember, although tomahawk is rather catchy...
Bruno
2005/5/30, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
IMO there is nothing wrong with a code name for a subproject. Look no
further than the shale subproject. Its a lot easier to refer to that
subproject as shale then to accurately capture that project with a
"meaningful" one word name.
If we picked a codename that had some meaning behind it as well
(lonewolf) that would be a bonus. We already call the project
"components" and it is not really accurate as it contains both
components and extensions. The subproject can stand on its own with
any RI so IMO its important to give it a catchy shorthand name.
sean
On 5/30/05, John Fallows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/30/05, Matt Blum < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think a boring name like "components" would be much more meaningful than
> > a cool name like "tomahawk."
>
> We need a balance between boring and cool that both captures
> attention, yet remains informative.
>
> How about Tomahawk Faces Extensions as the official name, with just
> tomahawk as a convenient short form for mailing lists, etc?
>
> Btw, I deliberately say "Extensions" over "Components" above because
> there is obviously a lot more to extending Faces than just components.
>
> Kind Regards,
> John Fallows.
>
