Go ahead and enter the feature request in jira. We can discuss/capture the details there.
Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert > -----Original Message----- > From: Shinsuke SUGAYA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 6:17 PM > To: MyFaces Development > Subject: Re: build order for MyFaces Portlet > > Stan Silvert wrote: > > What is there now should be fine. MyFacesGenericPortlet belongs with > > impl. It is no different from MyFacesServlet in that regard. > > > > The problem is that the JSF spec never got around to defining JSFPortlet > > the way they did FacesServlet. They defined the functionality, but not > > name of the Portlet. I'll try to see that this is addressed in JSF 2.0 > > if I am still on the EG next time around. > > Good! I agree with you. > > > In the mean time, I think the solution is to use delegation instead of > > inheritance. I will change the MyFacesGenericPortlet to define plug > > points. Then tomahawk can contain the needed plugins without extending > > MyFacesGenericPortlet. Then there will be no dependency. > > > > Come to think of it, that is probably a cleaner solution anyway. I hate > > inheritance. > > > > Do you follow me Shinsuke? > > Yes. > I would like to know more details to update my suggestion :) > > Regards, > shinsuke > > > Stan Silvert > > JBoss, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > callto://stansilvert > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:39 PM > >>To: MyFaces Development > >>Subject: Re: build order for MyFaces Portlet > >> > >>Tomahawk should work with either the RI or MyFaces. So if there is a > >>dependency in the portlet stuff on MyFaces impl that needs to be added > >>to JIRA and then fixed. I haven't been following the portlet stuff > >>but if its possible to move something our of impl and into the "share" > >>subproject, that might be a solution. > >> > >>sean > >> > >> > >>>>It is OK for tomahawk to reference the base impl, but it is not OK > > > > for > > > >>>>impl to reference tomahawk. > >>> > >>>I just reread my post and realized that the above may not be > > > > correct. > > > >>>It might be that tomahawk can only reference the JSF API and not > > > > impl. > > > >>>Hmm. Now I think I see your dilemma. > >>> > >>>Can anyone give an authoritative answer about tomahawk? > >>> > >>> > >>>>Stan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Regards, > >>>>> shinsuke > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Stan Silvert > >>>>>>JBoss, Inc. > >>>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>callto://stansilvert > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>From: Shinsuke SUGAYA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:48 AM > >>>>>>>To: Stan Silvert > >>>>>>>Subject: build order for MyFaces Portlet > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Hi Stan, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>I'm working on MyFaces' portlet. > >>>>>>>For build order, I encountered the issue. > >>>>>>>I would like to use AddResource in impl/ directory, but > >>>>>>>AddResource class is in tomahawk. Therefore, I could not > >>>>>>>build impl jar... Do you have any idea? My suggestion is > >>>>>>>to create a new directory(ex. portlet) and move files for > >>>>>>>the portlet. So, myfaces-portlet.jar is created. What do > >>>>>>>you think? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Regards, > >>>>>>>shinsuke > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>__________________________________ > >>>>>>>Save the earth > >>>>>>>http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>__________________________________ > >>>>>Save the earth > >>>>>http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/ > >>> > >>> > > > > __________________________________ > Save the earth > http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ondanka/
