+1 -- Mathias
2005/9/9, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 > Thanks Sean, > -Manfred > > 2005/9/9, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So are we ok to build a release candidate now? If so, I will try and > > get one up this weekend. > > > > sean > > > > On 9/8/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > 2005/9/8, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 13:26 -0400, Abrams, Howard A wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:24 AM > > > > > > To: MyFaces Development > > > > > > Subject: Release decisions > > > > > > > > > > > > I just fixed an important stumbling block in the build script so now > > > > > > it should be possible to build a release *without* the sandbox stuff > > > > > > (and without the build crashing.) There have been a lot of changes > > > > > > to > > > > > > the HEAD during the past week, so I'm not sure how we should > > > > > > proceed. > > > > > > > > > > > > My thinking is that we should rebuild the 1_0_10 tag/branch with the > > > > > > newest code and just heavily test. I think there is too much stuff > > > > > > in > > > > > > the HEAD that we would want. But at some point we need to freeze > > > > > > the > > > > > > 1.0.10 code. > > > > > > > > > > > > So I propose that I make a new 1.0.10 branch off the latest code and > > > > > > that we use that to build a release candidate. Only the most > > > > > > important bugs (such as missing stuff from the release bundle) would > > > > > > then be addressed in 1.0.10. Last minute requests for fixing > > > > > > specific > > > > > > bugs will be fixed on the trunk but they won't go into 1.0.10. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I get a few +1's on that? > > > > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Mathias
