Howard, You are now member of "myfaces-developers" group on Jira. Can you please check if this gives you enough rights? Thanks, Manfred
2005/11/21, Abrams, Howard A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If you're certain that issues on the custom/extended components have no > chance of holding up a release (other than taking resources away from > fixing issue in the api/impl), then you're right, there isn't a need. > However, I think that without a clear plan the issue is confused. > > I think we can use the 'road map' feature of JIRA to pick issues for > each upcoming minor release. I'll volunteer to take a stab at creating a > 'road map' for 1.1.2, (if someone can give me any access required). > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:05 AM > > To: MyFaces Development > > Subject: Re: Plan for 1.1.2? > > > > Well, there is nothing to argue against quicker release cycles. EXCEPT > > the fact that a new release (not a build!) does not emerge alone, ie. > > cannot be fully automated. There are things like release candidate > > voting, testing (!), release notes, homepage updates, announcements. > > Which takes time. > > Sean and Bill have spent much much time in releasing so far (thanks!) > > and many have helped to make it as easy as possible. But of course: > > Any additional help is welcome! > > The more volunteer helpers and testers we have, the faster we can have > > our cycles. > > > > As Howard did mention, a release plan would be good. Any volunteer who > > is willing to look over the open Jira issues and classify them? > > Any thoughts about future milestones? > > > > -0.5 from my side for releasing the API/impl separately: > > There is no need IMHO. API/Impl are the most important parts. So, if > > there really is a showstopper, this alone would legitimate a new > > release. Regardless of small bugs in one of the addons or sub > > projects. > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > Manfred > > > > > > > > > > 2005/11/20, Travis Reeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > +1 for the quicker release cycle. > > > > > > Travis > > > > > > On 11/20/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Not sure about the release plan, but +1 for a quicker release > cycle. > > > > Let's not get caught up in the same slow cycle that has affected > > > > Struts for so long. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > James Mitchell > > > > 678.910.8017 > > > > Skpe: jmitchtx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:19 PM, Abrams, Howard A wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a release plan for 1.1.2? It seems there are a > significant > > > > > number of issues on the trunk; some of which may not be marked > as > > > > > such in JIRA. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, now that we've gotten passed the TCK, moved to SVN, and > > > > > broken out the various sub projects, I'd like to revisit the > > > > > subject of releasing the API/impl separately from the > components. > > > > > There are many of us who do not use any of the sub projects, so > it > > > > > seems silly to hold back a release of the impl due to a bug in > some > > > > > random fancy component. Any +1's out there? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > h. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
