Yes you are right... I will change it immediately
Simon Kitching wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: werpu
Date: Tue Jan 3 13:52:40 2006
New Revision: 365751
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=365751&view=rev
Log:
fixed a bug, which caused the jdk 1.4 to fail on the BigDecimal
constructors
Modified:
myfaces/examples/trunk/simple/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/examples/listexample/SimpleCountryList.java
- _countries.add(new SimpleCountry(1, "AUSTRIA", "AT", new
BigDecimal(123), createCities(new
String[]{"Wien","Graz","Linz","Salzburg"})));
+ _countries.add(new SimpleCountry(1, "AUSTRIA", "AT", new
BigDecimal((long)123), createCities(new
String[]{"Wien","Graz","Linz","Salzburg"})));
Wouldn't it be better to use this?
new BigDecimal(123L)
This will definitely store the constant in the class as a LONG type. The
"(long)123" syntax might store the constant as an int, then perform the
typecast at runtime.
Of course it's a pretty minor point...
Cheers,
Simon
