Please no multiple branches. Thanks. Dennis Byrne
>-----Original Message----- >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:56 PM >To: 'MyFaces Development', [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces Committers/Contributors >meeting] > >OK so Stan is past the TC 5.5 point. Why do we need two branches? >Can't we just say that 1.2 depends on TC 6.0 or Glassfish? I still >think we need to do everything we can to avoid multiple branches. > >Sean > >On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No. The current build should be compatible again - if I don't have old >> information here... >> >> regards, >> >> Martin >> >> On 5/24/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > So does this mean that our Tomahawk releases are no longer compatible >> > with the RI? That's our current problem right? >> > >> > Sean >> > >> > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > There is no 1.1 compliant way of fixing dummyform - there just isn't. >> > > >> > > I would have gone with a single branch for 1.2 and checking in TC5.5 >> > > compatible stuff only, but Stan has already worked on 1.2, and he has >> > > implemented also TC6 depending things, so no chance to go with this, >> > > except we want to loose what Stan did, and I wouldn't. >> > > >> > > I want to do development on the 1.1 branch for bugfixes only anymore. >> > > 1.2 is our future, and we should go there! >> > > >> > > regards, >> > > >> > > Martin >> > > >> > > On 5/23/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > Are we talking about the fix for DummyForm? Are we not going to >> > > > attempt to have a 1.1 compatible fix? What about a single branch for >> > > > 1.2 and only check in the Tomcat 5.5 compatible stuff? >> > > > >> > > > I agree with Craig that you don't want to be actively developing on >> > > > the trunk plus two branches. Trust me, its difficult enough managing >> > > > this when we have a short-lived branch for a release. >> > > > >> > > > -1 for a long-term double branch strategy. >> > > > >> > > > Sean >> > > > >> > > > On 5/23/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > It's just that we need the 1.2 features for several things we want to >> > > > > fix right now - and TC6 is still not released, so we can't work with >> > > > > the full feature set of 1.2. >> > > > > >> > > > > regards, >> > > > > >> > > > > Martin >> > > > > >> > > > > On 5/22/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > > Why is there a need to have a separate branch for TC6 vs. TC55. >> > > > > > Sorry >> > > > > > if I missed the discussion on the need for this ... >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Sean >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On 5/22/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > > > Hi Craig, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > critical fixes to 1.1. -> 1.1 branch >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > major development --> trunk >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > special things for 1.2 under TC6 only --> 1.2 branch >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > With this, it should be albe to merge down the 1.2 branch to the >> > > > > > > trunk, right? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > regards, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Martin >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On 5/21/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > Ok, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > one more addition to the discussion - I'll want to branches. >> > > > > > > > > One for >> > > > > > > > > JSF1.2 things which cannot be used together with Tomcat 5.5 >> > > > > > > > > and, one >> > > > > > > > > for JSF1.2 things which can be used with Tomcat 5.5. I'd >> > > > > > > > > love trunk to >> > > > > > > > > be the JSF1.2/Tomcat 5.5 branch, and have bug fixes for 1.1 >> > > > > > > > > on a real >> > > > > > > > > branch. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > summary: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 1.1 --> branch >> > > > > > > > > 1.2 Tomcat 6 --> branch >> > > > > > > > > 1.2 Tomcat 5.5. --> trunk >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > is that ok? >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Wouldn't this mean that every change that worked under 5.5 >> > > > > > > > would need to be >> > > > > > > > committed to both branches? That seems like a good way to >> > > > > > > > slow down the >> > > > > > > > effort to achieve 1.2 compliance. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > regards, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Martin >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Craig >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On 5/19/06, Stan Silvert < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > That would be fine. After I am done we may need some help >> > > > > > > > > > from Sean. >> > > > > > > > > > He was talking about putting Tomcat 6 jars in an Apache >> > > > > > > > > > Maven >> > > > > > > > > > repository. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I've been building with NetBeans and not Maven. So >> > > > > > > > > > someone who is more >> > > > > > > > > > Maven savvy will need to update things so it builds >> > > > > > > > > > correctly. I don't >> > > > > > > > > > think it will be more complicated than adding and removing >> > > > > > > > > > some >> > > > > > > > > > dependencies. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Stan Silvert >> > > > > > > > > > JBoss, Inc. >> > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > > > > > > callto://stansilvert >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > > > > > > From: Manfred Geiler [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:48 PM >> > > > > > > > > > > To: MyFaces Development >> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces >> > > > > > > > > > > Committers/Contributors meeting] >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Sean, >> > > > > > > > > > > Can you please make a copy of the current trunk to >> > > > > > > > > > > /myfaces/core/branches/jsf_1_2 ? >> > > > > > > > > > > After that, Stan can simply (?) merge his stuff inside >> > > > > > > > > > > that. >> > > > > > > > > > > Is that ok, Stan? >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Manfred >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > You want a 1.2 branch for core only using the latest >> > > > > > > > > > > > trunk right? I >> > > > > > > > > > > > can create it for you if you want ... >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sean >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Manfred, can you go ahead with that 1.2 branch? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm having a look at tomahawk 416 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for creating a 1.2 branch >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have implemented most of the new core API's >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and fixed most >> > > > > > > > > > of >> > > > > > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deprecated ones to be backwards compatible with >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.1 (if you >> > > > > > > > > > look >> > > > > > > > > > > at the >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.2 javadocs you'll see what I mean). If you >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > look at the >> > > > > > > > > > section >> > > > > > > > > > > in the >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spec preface entitled "What's Changed Since the >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Last Release" >> > > > > > > > > > you >> > > > > > > > > > > can >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > get a feel for what I did. I've pretty much >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > done everything >> > > > > > > > > > in >> > > > > > > > > > > that >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of it is covered under this issue, which >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just says to >> > > > > > > > > > > implement >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > several sections of the spec: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1274 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe all of 1274 is complete except >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ApplicationImpl.getResourceBundle (). I >> > > > > > > > needed code that reads >> > > > > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > > > new >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > faces-context.xml for that one. However, all >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the ELResolver >> > > > > > > > > > stuff >> > > > > > > > > > > is >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > done including the ResourceBundleELResolver. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've also done some of the issues listed under >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > General >> > > > > > > > > > Changes. >> > > > > > > > > > > For >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > each item in that list, I created a Jira task. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can look >> > > > > > > > > > at >> > > > > > > > > > > Jira and >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see which ones I did. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was just getting started on the >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javax.faces.webapp package >> > > > > > > > > > when >> > > > > > > > > > > I was >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > taken off of the project. I probably won't >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit any changes >> > > > > > > > > > > from >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that. I didn't touch the components or renderer >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at all. With >> > > > > > > > > > all >> > > > > > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > backward-compatible code I wrote, it appears >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that all the >> > > > > > > > > > > components >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > still work even though they are written the " >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.1 way". >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, hopefully, what you guys will have to start >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with is a JSF >> > > > > > > > > > 1.2 >> > > > > > > > > > > impl >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is about half-way done and still works. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan Silvert >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JBoss, Inc. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > callto://stansilvert >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:58 PM >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MyFaces >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Committers/Contributors meeting] >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for solving tomahawk 416, being >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > incompatible to RI is a >> > > > > > > > > > > serious >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issue >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan which 1.2 issues did you fix. Did you >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > change any link >> > > > > > > > > > > renderers? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, i am >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for open a 1.2 branch >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/17/06, Werner Punz < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield schrieb: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm -1 on the 1.2 branch. There are major >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issues to be >> > > > > > > > > > > fixed in >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > core right now. (See TOMAHAWK-416 and >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > related dev >> > > > > > > > > > > discussions.) >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know that Stan is anxious but given the >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lack of interest >> > > > > > > > > > in >> > > > > > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > core >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trunk, its hard to imagine we have enough >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > support to >> > > > > > > > > > sustain >> > > > > > > > > > > this >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > branch. Do we have firm committments from >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anyone else >> > > > > > > > > > > besides >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for a fork... the reason we need to get >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > going asap and >> > > > > > > > > > a >> > > > > > > > > > > fork >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we wait for another bunch of issues to be >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fixed, this >> > > > > > > > > > will >> > > > > > > > > > > never >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > end. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry to say that so harsh, but the time on >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.2 is really >> > > > > > > > > > > pressing, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > given that there wont be an option in jee to >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > override the >> > > > > > > > > > > default >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation via other libs in WEB-INF/lib >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like it was >> > > > > > > > > > > possible in >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JEE4 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> > > > > > > Courses in English and German >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > >> > > > > http://www.irian.at >> > > > > >> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> > > > > Courses in English and German >> > > > > >> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > >> > > http://www.irian.at >> > > >> > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> > > Courses in English and German >> > > >> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> > > >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >
