> > It will be JBoss 5.0 containing JSF 1.2, Tomcat 6, EJB 3, and Seam. > Probably Facelets too.
BTW, don't take this to mean that we currently have plans to ship Facelets with JBoss. I was just answering the full question. Yes, I think Facelets is cool and I'll probably be using it in the near future. Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert > -----Original Message----- > From: Stan Silvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 2:23 PM > To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; MyFaces Discussion > Subject: RE: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets > > That's easy. > > It will be JBoss 5.0 containing JSF 1.2, Tomcat 6, EJB 3, and Seam. > Probably Facelets too. > > :-) > > Stan Silvert > JBoss, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > callto://stansilvert > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:10 AM > > To: MyFaces Discussion; MyFaces Development > > Subject: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets > > > > May I ask a question out loud? > > > > In discussing implementing 1.2, the question has arisen what kind of > > servlet containers most users have in use currently respectively plan > > to use in the next half year. > > > > Can you answer with the corresponding number to help us figure out an > > optimal way of going on with the 1.2 implementation? > > > > (for me personally it's 1 - I can't change over my current project to > > facelets this easily, and this is why I'm stuck with number 1) > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > 1) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant) > > 2) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant) with facelets (or willing > > to change their current projects to facelets, if necessary) > > 3) TC 6 or Glassfish (or other JSP 2.1 compliant)