I thought I was committing to a branch. See my other email about this.
Stan Silvert JBoss, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://stansilvert > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 9:06 AM > To: Stan Silvert > Cc: MyFaces Development > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > Committers/Contributors meeting] > > ah, ok... all clear > > What about the branches? You did commit to the trunk now, right? > > regards, > > Martin > > On 5/29/06, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > MethodBinding and ValueBinding are still there for backward > > compatibility. It is the MethodBindingImpl and ValueBindingImpl that > > are no longer needed. > > > > Take a look at what now happens when you call > > ApplicationImpl.createValueBinding() and > > ApplicationImpl.createMethodBinding(). > > > > > > > > Stan Silvert > > JBoss, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > callto://stansilvert > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 3:55 AM > > > To: MyFaces Development > > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > > > Committers/Contributors meeting] > > > > > > Thanks, Stan. > > > > > > You say that MethodBinding and ValueBinding are dead code now - how > > > about the backwards compatibility with old components, where those > > > classes are still used? > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 5/29/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thank you for this work Stan. > > > > > > > > Dennis Byrne > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > > >From: Stan Silvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 12:12 AM > > > > >To: 'MyFaces Development', [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Subject: RE: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > > > Committers/Contributors meeting] > > > > > > > > > >Done. > > > > > > > > > >A few notes: > > > > > > > > > >- I think I counted 95 new or modified source files. You have > > plenty > > > of > > > > >new stuff to play with. > > > > >- It compiles and runs - honest it does. However, I'm sure that it > > > > >won't build with maven. I haven't touched the build scripts. I've > > > been > > > > >building with NetBeans. > > > > >- You will need the Tomcat jars as I laid out in my wiki > > > > >- Core no longer relies on commons-el. > > > > >- All the new javax API's are implemented except some in the webapp > > > > >package. > > > > >- I haven't touched the taglibs > > > > > > > > > >The following can probably be removed. I think they are just dead > > code > > > > >now: > > > > >VariableResolverImpl.java > > > > >PropertyResolverImpl.java > > > > >MethodBindingImpl.java > > > > >ValueBindingImpl.java > > > > >ElParserHelper.java > > > > >BundleUtils.java > > > > > > > > > >Enjoy. > > > > > > > > > >Stan Silvert > > > > >JBoss, Inc. > > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >callto://stansilvert > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > > >> From: Stan Silvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 6:12 PM > > > > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; MyFaces Development > > > > >> Subject: RE: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > > > > >> Committers/Contributors meeting] > > > > >> > > > > >> With no objections, I'll put it there as soon as I get a chance. > > > > >> Probably Sunday or Monday. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> Stan Silvert > > > > >> JBoss, Inc. > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> callto://stansilvert > > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > > > >> > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:02 AM > > > > >> > To: MyFaces Development; Stan Silvert > > > > >> > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces > > > > >> > Committers/Contributors meeting] > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Ok, done - Stan, can you commit your changes there? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > regards, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Martin > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On 5/26/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > What I'll do anyway right now is create a branch of current. > > I'll > > > > >> > > still call it jsf12tc6 - if we settle this discussion with > > the > > > > >> result > > > > >> > > that this is going to be our only branch, it shouldn't be too > > > much > > > > >> of > > > > >> > > a misnoming. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > regards, > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Martin > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On 5/24/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > until TC 6 is released. Besides, most of the work I do > > in > > > > >core > > > > >> is > > > > >> > in Junit > > > > >> > > > > rather than a container. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > if it is just the availability of jsp 2.1 jars, the jetty > > folks > > > > >> have > > > > >> > > > their own (public) maven2 repo > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > -Matthias > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > -- > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > http://www.irian.at > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > >> > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > >> > > Courses in English and German > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > > > > > >> > http://www.irian.at > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > >> > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > >> > Courses in English and German > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
