OK thanks for the suggestion. Sean
On 6/7/06, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sean, If you're trying IDEA, try the very latest EAP build (5321), which has way better JSF support. On 6/7/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure, I'll also adopt the POMs. They don't reference a config file directly, but the resources location. > > regards, > > > Martin > > > > On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there only one faces-config.xml? If you move it (which would be > > nice) we need to make sure the poms don't reference the old location. > > > > Sean > > > > On 6/7/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > > it's not required anymore - we could change that. I'll do it. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > On 6/6/06, Sean Schofield < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Martin, > > > > > > > > I'm currently trying out IDEA. I seem to recall that you created > > > > resources-facesconfig for a reason related to IDEA. Can you refresh > > > > my memory as to why its necessary to be in its own folder instead of > > > > with the rest of the resources in src/main/resources? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces -- Grant Smith
