Folks, should we ask on the user list for some *testing* help? Since it's summer/vacation time, I guess not much will happen here :)
.Matthias On 8/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok, I tested that <dif_to_revert> - private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_PARAM = "autoScroll"; - private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION = "getScrolling()"; + private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_PARAM = "org_apache_myfaces_autoScroll"; + private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION = "org_apache_myfaces_getScrolling"; </dif_to_revert> for the shared203 (114 core_release) and the myfaces-core works with 1.1.4 AND 1.1.5 of TOMAHAWK. So I commit it now; to both (branch and trunk) Please, others check the *new* branch against your application. I mean, it's not a big deal to test it... so no reason for not testing it. -Matthias On 8/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, > > I think this "dif" can stay > > <dif> > public static void appendAutoScrollAssignment(StringBuffer > onClickValue, String formName) > { > + onClickValue.append("if(window."+AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION+"!=undefined)"); > + onClickValue.append("{"); > onClickValue.append("document.forms['").append(formName).append("']"); > onClickValue.append(".elements['").append(AUTO_SCROLL_PARAM).append("']"); > - onClickValue.append(".value=").append(AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION).append(";"); > + onClickValue.append(".value=").append(AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION).append("();"); > + onClickValue.append("}"); > + > } > </dif> > > I'll just revert the name/param > > > <dif_to_revert> > - private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_PARAM = "autoScroll"; > - private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION = "getScrolling()"; > + private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_PARAM = > "org_apache_myfaces_autoScroll"; > + private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION = > "org_apache_myfaces_getScrolling"; > </dif_to_revert> > > means, name it back to getScrolling()... > > -Matthias > > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > looks like all people here are > > > -1 on keeping (or +1 on putting it to the 1.2 branch) > > > > > > I'll wait until tonight (US time) and do some stuff there; > > > > > > Makes sense? > > > > Yes. Thanks for helping (again.) > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > Sean > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com