Folks,

should we ask on the user list for some *testing* help?
Since it's summer/vacation time, I guess not much will happen here :)

.Matthias

On 8/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok,

I tested that

<dif_to_revert>
-    private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_PARAM = "autoScroll";
-    private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION = "getScrolling()";
+    private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_PARAM =
"org_apache_myfaces_autoScroll";
+    private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION =
"org_apache_myfaces_getScrolling";
</dif_to_revert>

for the shared203 (114 core_release)  and the myfaces-core works with
1.1.4 AND 1.1.5 of TOMAHAWK.

So I commit it now; to both (branch and trunk)

Please, others check the *new* branch against your application.
I mean, it's not a big deal to test it... so no reason for not testing it.

-Matthias

On 8/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I think this "dif" can stay
>
> <dif>
>     public static void appendAutoScrollAssignment(StringBuffer
> onClickValue, String formName)
>      {
> +        
onClickValue.append("if(window."+AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION+"!=undefined)");
> +        onClickValue.append("{");
>          
onClickValue.append("document.forms['").append(formName).append("']");
>          
onClickValue.append(".elements['").append(AUTO_SCROLL_PARAM).append("']");
> -        
onClickValue.append(".value=").append(AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION).append(";");
> +        
onClickValue.append(".value=").append(AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION).append("();");
> +        onClickValue.append("}");
> +
>      }
> </dif>
>
> I'll just revert the name/param
>
>
> <dif_to_revert>
> -    private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_PARAM = "autoScroll";
> -    private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION = "getScrolling()";
> +    private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_PARAM =
> "org_apache_myfaces_autoScroll";
> +    private static final String AUTO_SCROLL_FUNCTION =
> "org_apache_myfaces_getScrolling";
> </dif_to_revert>
>
> means, name it back to getScrolling()...
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > looks like all people here are
> > > -1 on keeping (or +1 on putting it to the 1.2 branch)
> > >
> > > I'll wait until tonight (US time) and do some stuff there;
> > >
> > > Makes sense?
> >
> > Yes.  Thanks for helping (again.)
> >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > Sean
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>


--
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com



--
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Reply via email to