Tomahawk for now, if there's ever something like Faces-Goodies or Faces-Commons, it should go there.
regards, Martin On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
where to go? tomahawk ? myfaces? extra lib? shale ? On 8/17/06, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've thought more on this and read the entire discussion again. Since > resolver seems more flexible than the bean, I'd say resolver now. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-607 > > I've assigned it to myself. > > Cheers, > > Cagatay > > > On 8/17/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Ok, as long as it's compatible with the RI and someone commits the > > work, I'm +1 for a custom resolver. > > > > If we want to go for the easier solution of a bean and someone commits > > the work for this, I'm +1 for the bean as well. > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That resolver sounds interesting, also sorta bean approach is more than > nice. > > > As I read this thread the "new" component is not going to make it. > Great. > > > Adding components like this one looks to me "blow up" the page. Such a > > > map/resolver looks like a better approach. > > > > > > Also Mike is right in his Facelets vs. JSP mail > > > > > > +0 on map/resolver > > > (+0 b/c won't do the work) > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > PS: My Oracle Germany college Frank has written an article about > > > JSF/Security. Already printed... > > > http://www.orablogs.com/fnimphius/archives/001790.html > > > > > > On 8/16/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/16/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hmm, but we suggested to build it as a map-bean to be able to pass > > > > > parameters. So what would be the positive aspect of using a resolver > > > > > with regard to parameters? > > > > > > > > If it's a resolver, you should be able to pass the parameters > directly. > > > > > > > > Ie, > > > > > > > > security:ifAnyGranted="manager, admin" or security:ifGranted:manager > > > > or security:ifGranted('manager'). > > > > > > > > basically, once it's a resolver, we should have total control of the > format. > > > > I think something like this is probably simplest: > > > > > > > > security:ifGranted:manager > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > Courses in English and German > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
