[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1418?page=all ]

Martin Marinschek updated MYFACES-1418:
---------------------------------------

        Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)
    Resolution: Fixed
      Assignee: Martin Marinschek

Thanks to Nikolay Petrov for this fix.

I wonder - should the new base-class be prefixed by an underscore, to really 
make sure that this is not part of the public API? It's already 
package-private, so its ok to add it, but maybe we should have an additional 
indicator here.

regards,

Martin

> javax.faces.validator - DoubleRangeValidator, LengthValidator, 
> LongRangeValidator are very similar, refactor common behaviour
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MYFACES-1418
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1418
>             Project: MyFaces Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JSR-127
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.4
>            Reporter: Nikolay Petrov
>         Assigned To: Martin Marinschek
>             Fix For: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
>
>         Attachments: validator.patch
>
>
> The 3 classes are very similar to each other except the type of minimum and 
> maximum (and value of course). Therefore I'll suggest extracting the common 
> behaviour in common parent class. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to