Aneesha Govil wrote:
> I would second that. There is no way to apply bug-fix patches without
> upgrading to a newer, "not-stable-yet" snapshot nightly build.
>
Well yes, unless you are comfortable applying the patches yourself and
maintaining/building the source locally. While this will always be the
preferred solution for a select few of the users, the broad majority of
us would be much better served by official maintenance releases.
Regards,
Jeff Bischoff
Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
Aneesha Govil wrote:
On 12/21/06, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
The problem with this is
that, despite lengthening your release cycle, you are still having
trouble with release stability. In order to achieve this stability, you
either need to be willing to branch for extensive testing before a
release (even though it is meanwhile "getting out of date"). Or, you can
take a look at ideas like Paul Spencer's idea for following a Tomcat
style of release.
If you're going to be releasing code that is only a few days or a week
fresh from the trunk, then you're going to need to start releasing
maintenance updates to gradually add to their stability. I'm just a
humble user, but this is my 2 cents...
I would second that. There is no way to apply bug-fix patches without
upgrading to a newer, "not-stable-yet" snapshot nightly build.
Regards,
Aneesha
Regards,
Jeff Bischoff
Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
Thomas Spiegl wrote:
> tomahawk 1.1.4 branch is quite out of date by now. I'd like to skip
> this one, and start releasing core and tomahawk 1.1.5 asap.
>
>
> On 12/18/06, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is yet another release status request.
>>
>> Current open issue with a Fix Version = 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
>> > MYFACES-1372 <h:messages> not shown (-> not working)
>> ** Per an 8-Dec-2006 Posting from Mike Kienenberger:
>> MYFACES-1372 <h:messages> not shown (-> not working) is important,
>> but it's been broken for 18 months. It's not a regression as far as
>> I know.
>>
>> > MYFACES-1409 incorrect behavior after RESTORE_VIEW
responseComplete
>>
>> > MYFACES-1411 Lifecycle phase executions repetitions
>> ** Per an 8-Dec-2006 Posting from Mike Kienenberger:
>> MYFACES-1411 has I.P. issues.
>>
>>
>> > MYFACES-1506 Translated messages in Messages.properties files
>> ** Per an 8-Dec-2006 Posting from Mike Kienenberger:
>> MYFACES-1506 is an improvement. It can be moved to 1.1.6. Actually,
>> this is a Tomahawk issue, not a MyFaces one. Should be moved. Not
>> sure how Messages.properties interacts with Tomahawk, though.
>>
>>
>> None of the above issue are marked as blockers. Are any of the
actually
>> blockers to the 1.1.5 release?
>>
>>
>> What is holding up this release?
>>
>> Paul Spencer
>>
>>
>
>
