>From: "Martin Marinschek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi Craig, > > Facelets supports a > > setPropertyActionListener > > as well - if Clay does, I can't say. >
The current Clay JSF 1.2 support is limited to the things that are not 1.2 specific. As you know, the new SetPropertyActionListener uses the new ValueExpression interface. After our next Shale release, we need to start looking at how to support all of the new 1.2 features including multiple versions of the clay configurations. I welcome any interested parties. > regards, > > Martin Gary > > On 12/20/06, Craig McClanahan wrote: > > > > > > On 12/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > Just out of curiousity, where did they add "it"? I don't see any > > reference > > > > to updateActionListener in 1.2. > > > > > > it is named setPropertyActionListener in the spec and in trinidad > > > setActinListener > > > > Thanks ... I had not recalled that from when I last did a detailed review > > of > > all the 1.2 changes. Hmm, between that and , JSF has > > a pretty good analog to the "Beans Binding" JSR for Swing (JSR-296) :-), > > but > > only if you're using JSP :-(. I presume that the alternative view handlers > > like Clay and Facelets will deal with that issue on their own. > > > > > -M > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > By the way, is this similar to (or identical to) your idea for a > > preupdate() > > > > method in Shale's ViewController (SHALE-338)? If so, I still like the > > idea > > > > ... just need to see the follow through :-). > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > Just my $0.02 > > > > > > > > > > -M > > > > > > > > > > On 12/20/06, Werner Punz < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Craig McClanahan schrieb: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One of the architectural approaches that MyFaces developers seem > > to do > > > > > > > pretty often, even when they don't have to, is think of > > > > > > > everything > > as > > > > > > > needing a component. To me, this involves the person building the > > > > view > > > > > > > in decisions that really belong to the person working on the > > business > > > > > > > logic. Yes, it's often the same person, but where is the > > separation > > > > of > > > > > > > concerns? > > > > > > > > > > > > > That was indeed the concerns of the original scope tag > > > > > > (I am using it currently btw. it is excellent work) > > > > > > the original intent was to have a viable replacement for savestate > > > > > > which would allow quick and dirty scoping with a > > > > > > a visual/tag approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mario did this approach and he solved it in an excellent way > > > > > > and yes, there is a break in separation of concerns and it was > > > > > > intended by design to ease the development of small applications, > > > > > > > > > > > > you basically push the scope control and parts of the transaction > > > > > > handling into the visual part. > > > > > > > > > > > > But the idea was to have a tag like way for those things, and if > > > > > > you > > > > > > need it differently (which many apps do but many small ones dont) > > > > > > have other frameworks deal with it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now Mario, now he is moving into the Spring domain with his stuff, > > seems > > > > > > to be covering, let other frameworks do the scope control approach, > > > > > > as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Btw. The scope tag of Mario is really excellent you should give it > > > > > > a > > > > > > try, but I agree, separation of concerns is not really there and > > cannot > > > > > > be by design principle, but there are other frameworks and > > > > > > solutions > > > > > > to deal with this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > > > > > > > > > further stuff: > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > > > > > further stuff: > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
